Section 21 - Enforcement provisions

11 Citing briefs

  1. Sidibe v. Sutter Health

    REPLY

    Filed February 5, 2014

    15 U.S.C. § 21 (2006) (vesting authority to enforce compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 18 in the FTC “where applicable to all other character of commerce”); FTC v. Univ. Health, Inc., 938 Case 1:12-cv-00560-BLW Document 464 Filed 01/24/14 Page 40 of 52Case 3:12-cv-04854- B ocu ent 72 Filed 02/05/14 Page 75 of 87 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law – page 41 F.2d 1206, 1214–15 (11th Cir. 1991) (holding that 15 U.S.C. § 21 makes clear that the FTC’s enforcement of Section 7 applies to asset acquisitions by nonprofit hospitals). 8.

  2. Ciraulu v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 22 MOTION to Appoint The HWM Group to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed December 29, 2014

    D. Accordingly, Movant has satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 (a)   7 (3) (B) and is entitled to have its application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and approval of selection of counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 3. The Proposed Lead Plaintiff Has A Significant Financial Interest In The Relief Sought By The Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a) (3) (B) (iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the action. As evidenced by the accompanying signed certifications, the members of the HWM Group collectively purchased 45,115 shares of the Company’s common stock and suffered estimated losses of $205,512 as a result of defendants’ misconduct.

  3. Facebook, Inc. v. Wallace et al

    MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant Sanford Wallace

    Filed June 1, 2009

    20 It recognized that spam imposes significant monetary costs that must be addressed. See 15 U.S.C. 21 § 7701(a)(6) ("The growth in unsolicited commercial electronic mail imposes significant 22 monetary costs on providers of Internet access services.").

  4. Repex Ventures S.A v. Madoff et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 41 MOTION to Appoint Repex Ventures S.A. to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed May 5, 2009

    C. Accordingly, Movant has satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B) and is entitled to have its application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and approval of selection of counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 3. The Proposed Lead Plaintiff Has the Largest Financial Interest in the Relief Sought by the Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a) (3) (B) (iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the action. During the Class Period, as evidenced by, among other things, the accompanying signed certification, Movant invested $700,000 in Herald Funds during the Class Period and suffered a total loss of these investments as a result of defendants’ misconduct.

  5. Repex Ventures S.A v. Madoff et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 19 MOTION to Appoint Repex Ventures S.A. and Radovan Fijember to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed March 13, 2009

    C. Accordingly, Movant has satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 (a) (3) (B) and is entitled to have its application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and approval of selection of counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 3. The Proposed Lead Plaintiff Has The Largest Financial Interest In The Relief Sought By The Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a) (3) (B) (iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the action. During the Class Period, as evidenced by, among other things, the accompanying signed certification, Movant invested $833,617.85 in Medici Controlled Funds during the Class Period and suffered a total loss of these investments as a result of defendants’ misconduct.

  6. Grossman v. Oppenheimer & CO. Inc. et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 15 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:08-cv-4435.. Document

    Filed June 10, 2008

    See D’Agnenica Decl., Exhibits D and E. Accordingly, Movants have satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u- 4(a)(3)(A) & (B) and are entitled to have their application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and selection of counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court . Case 1:08-cv-03528-LAP Document 16 Filed 06/10/2008 Page 5 of 10 5 2. Movants Have a Significant Financial Interest in the Relief Sought by the Class Pursuant to the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. § 21(a)(3)(B)(iii), the court shall appoint the lead plaintiff who represents the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the action. Movants herein collectively hold $175,000 in illiquid, unredeemed auction rate securities purchased through Oppenheimer during the Class Period.

  7. City of Taylor Employees Retirement System v. Societe Generale Group et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 5 MOTION to Appoint Harold Oberkotter to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed May 12, 2008

    See Weiss Decl., Exhibit C. Accordingly, Movant has satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 (a) (3)(B) and is entitled to have his application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and his selection of Lead Counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 2. Movant Has The Largest Financial Interest In The Relief Sought By The Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a)(3)(B)(iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class. During the Class Period, as evidenced by, among other things, the accompanying signed certification, Movant Oberkotter purchased 6,000 of the Company’s ADRs and suffered Case 1:08-cv-02752-GEL Document 7 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 12 of 16 10 estimated losses of $41,480.60 as a result of defendants’ misconduct.

  8. In Re: Citigroup Inc. Securities Litigation

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel., 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 07-10258., 5 MOTION to Appoint David Garden to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed January 7, 2008

    D. Accordingly, Movant has satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 (a) (3) (B) and is entitled to have his application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and approval of selection of counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 3. The Proposed Lead Plaintiff Has A Significant Financial Interest In The Relief Sought By The Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a) (3) (B) (iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the action. During the Class Period, as evidenced by, among other things, the accompanying signed certification, Movant purchased 206,000 shares of the Company's common stock during the Class Period and suffered estimated losses of $2,130,405 as a result of defendants’ misconduct.

  9. Hammerschlag v. CitiGroup Inc. et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 12 MOTION to Appoint David Garden to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed January 7, 2008

    D. Accordingly, Movant has satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 (a) (3) (B) and is entitled to have his application for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and approval of selection of counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 3. The Proposed Lead Plaintiff Has A Significant Financial Interest In The Relief Sought By The Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a) (3) (B) (iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the action. During the Class Period, as evidenced by, among other things, the accompanying signed certification, Movant purchased 206,000 shares of the Company's common stock during the Class Period and suffered estimated losses of $2,130,405 as a result of defendants’ misconduct.

  10. In Re: Fuwei Films Securities Litigation

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel., 6 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:07-cv-09416 and 1:07-cv-10323., 4 MOTION to Appoint Meira Rubin and Costachi Leru to serve as lead plaintiff

    Filed December 18, 2007

    See Weiss Decl., Exhibit D. Accordingly, Movants have satisfied the individual requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 77z-1 (a) (3)(B) and are entitled to have their application for appointment as Lead Plaintiffs and their selection of Lead Counsel, as set forth herein, considered and approved by the Court. 2. Movants Have The Largest Financial Interest In The Relief Sought By The Class According to 15 U.S.C. § 21(a)(3)(B)(iii), the court shall appoint as lead plaintiff the class member or members who represent the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class. Case 1:07-cv-09416-RJS Document 7 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 11 of 15 10 During the Class Period, as evidenced by, among other things, the accompanying signed certifications, Movant Rubin purchased 1,500 shares of the Company’s common stock and has suffered estimated losses of approximately $4,402.10 as a result of defendants’ misconduct.