Section 28-3-104 - Personal tort actions; actions against certain professionals

20 Citing briefs

  1. Allied Waste North America, Inc. et al v. Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC et al

    MOTION for Summary Judgment Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion For Summary Judgment

    Filed October 27, 2014

    Determining this date requires the consideration of two elements: (1) the plaintiff must suffer legally cognizable damage due to the defendant’s conduct; and (2) the plaintiff must have actual or constructive knowledge that the 6 As previously discussed, the applicable statute of limitations is one year from the date the cause of action accrues. Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104(a)(2). Case 3:13-cv-00254 Document 83 Filed 10/27/14 Page 17 of 46 PageID #: 1840 18 injury occurred as a result of the defendant’s conduct.

  2. Streed et al V Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et Al.,

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed May 22, 2017

    For Personal Injury: 3 Years - N.C.G.S.A. § 1-52(1)-(5) MURPHY, WILLIAM Ohio May 2012 ¶17(g) 2 years - Ohio Revised Code Ann. § 2305.10(A) AYERS, WILLIE South Carolina November 2008 ¶28(g) 3 years - South Carolina Code Ann. §§ 15- 3-530, 15-3-535 BURNS, THOMAS Tennessee February 2016 ¶24(g) 1 year – Tennessee Code Ann. § 28-3-104 HART, SHIRLEY Texas May 2010 ¶9(g) 2 years - Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.

  3. M.B. v. Long et al

    RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed October 25, 2016

    (Docket No. 1, ¶ 82.) See TENN. CODE ANN. § 28-3-104(a)(1)(B). The allegations in that petition and the allegations in her Complaint in this action arose out of the same transaction or occurrence, namely Defendants’ refusal to accept and process an application submitted on her behalf while she was in a coma.

  4. Streed et al V Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et Al.,

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed June 15, 2017

    Stat. §5524(2) (FAC ¶ 20(g)) South California Ayers (11/2008) 3 years – S.C. Code Ann. §15-3-530, 15-3-535 (FAC ¶ 28(g)) Tennessee Burns (2/2016) 1 year – Tenn. Code Ann. §28-3-104 (FAC ¶ 24(g)) Texas Hart (5/2010) 2 years – Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.

  5. Amos v. Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. (Jrg1)

    MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

    Filed March 1, 2017

    Second, Plaintiff’s untimely intentional tort claim is also barred by the exclusive remedy provision of Tennessee’s Workers’ Compensation Law. Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104; Wiggins v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., No. 3:12-CV-115-PLR-CCS, 2015 WL 461625, at *8 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 3, 2015), aff’d, 641 F. App’x 545 (6th Cir. 2016).

  6. PARRISH v. LATHAM & WATKINS

    Amicus Curiae Brief of The Los Angeles County Bar Association and Beverly Hills Bar Association

    Filed June 10, 2016

    ? Alabama (Code ofAla. § 39(a)(1)), Arizona (A.R.S.§ 12-541), Kansas (K.S.A. § 60-514), Kentucky (K.R.S. § 413.140(1)(c)), Louisiana (La. Civ. Code Ann.art. 3492), Mississippi (Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-35.), New York (N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 215(3)), Ohio (Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2305.11(A)), Oklahoma (OKStat. § 12-95(4)), Tennessee (Tenn. Code § 28-3-104(a)), Texas (T.C.P.R. § 16.002(a)), Virginia (Va. Code § 8.01-248), West Virginia (Preiser v. MacQueen [W.Va. 1985] 352 S.E.2d 22, 27), Wyoming (Wyo.Stat. § 1-3- 105(a)(v)(C)). 25 In sum, a one-yearstatute of limitations for malicious prosecution actions against attorneys comports with nationwide standards, longstanding California history and precedent, and sound statutory interpretation.

  7. PARRISH v. LATHAM & WATKINS (To be called and continued to the June 2017 calendar.)

    Amicus Curiae Brief of The Los Angeles County Bar Association and Beverly Hills Bar Association

    Filed June 10, 2016

    ? Alabama (Code ofAla. § 39(a)(1)), Arizona (A.R.S.§ 12-541), Kansas (K.S.A. § 60-514), Kentucky (K.R.S. § 413.140(1)(c)), Louisiana (La. Civ. Code Ann.art. 3492), Mississippi (Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-35.), New York (N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 215(3)), Ohio (Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2305.11(A)), Oklahoma (OKStat. § 12-95(4)), Tennessee (Tenn. Code § 28-3-104(a)), Texas (T.C.P.R. § 16.002(a)), Virginia (Va. Code § 8.01-248), West Virginia (Preiser v. MacQueen [W.Va. 1985] 352 S.E.2d 22, 27), Wyoming (Wyo.Stat. § 1-3- 105(a)(v)(C)). 25 In sum, a one-yearstatute of limitations for malicious prosecution actions against attorneys comports with nationwide standards, longstanding California history and precedent, and sound statutory interpretation.

  8. Allied Waste North America, Inc. et al v. Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC et al

    MEMORANDUM signed

    Filed March 20, 2015

    The relevant statute of limitations for legal malpractice claims (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104(a)(2) at the time this suit was filed) provides: Actions and suits against licensed public accountants, certified public accountants, or attorneys for malpractice shall be commenced within one (1) year after the cause of action accrued, whether the action or suit is grounded or based in contract or tort. Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104(c)(1). “A cause of action for legal malpractice accrues and the statute of limitations is triggered when: 1) the defendant committed negligence; 2) the defendant’s negligence caused the plaintiff to suffer a ‘legally cognizable’ or actual injury; and 3) the plaintiff knows, or in the exercise of reasonable care and diligence should have known, that the injury was 6 Case 3:13-cv-00254 Document 132 Filed 03/20/15 Page 6 of 42 PageID #: 5323 caused by the defendant’s negligence.”

  9. Allied Waste North America, Inc. et al v. Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC et al

    RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Summary Judgment , 79 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 85 MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed November 17, 2014

    Case 3:13-cv-00254 Document 99 Filed 11/17/14 Page 26 of 93 PageID #: 2275 - 19 - 9675762 The statute of limitations for legal malpractice is one year from the time the cause of action accrues. T.C.A. § 28-3-104(c). The discovery rule governs when the cause of action accrues.

  10. Allied Waste North America, Inc. et al v. Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC et al

    MEMORANDUM in Support of 80 MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed October 27, 2014

    The statute applies to “[a]ctions and suits against attorneys...whether the actions are grounded or based in contract or tort.” T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a)(2)(emphasis added). B. Allied’s cause of action against Lewis King accrued well before March 20, 12 Case 3:13-cv-00254 Document 81 Filed 10/27/14 Page 12 of 22 PageID #: 1806 2012, i.e., the date which is one year before the filing date of March 20, 2013.