4 Citing briefs
Ambrose v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment 32 Oral Argument requested.
Filed October 21, 2013
A prima facie case of disability retaliation, requires Ambrose to show: 1) he engaged in or was engaging in protected activity, 2) the employer subjected him to an adverse employment decision, and 3) that there was a causal link between the protected activity and the employer’s action. ORS 659A.112; Barnett, 228 F.3d at 1113; see also, Pardi v. Kaiser Found. Hosp., 389 F.3d 840 (9th Cir. 2004).
Werner v. Sturgeon Electric Company, Inc.
Motion for Summary Judgment and Incorporated Legal Memorandum In Support.
Filed May 30, 2017
G 25:25- 26:6. His claim under ORS 659A.112 and ORS 659A.118 therefore warrant dismissal. c. Plaintiff was not retaliated against for invoking his rights under ORS 659A.109.
Daniel v. Oregon Health & Sciences University et al
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment . Oral Argument requested.
Filed June 5, 2017
No. 1-14.) On November 12,2015, plaintiff filed a complaint with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries ("BOLI"), co-filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), alleging violations of ORS 659A.030 and ORS 659A.112. (O'Kasey Decl, Ex.
Garcia v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Motion for Summary Judgment .
Filed February 6, 2017
42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(a). “ADA” refers to the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination because of disability and is the federal equivalent of ORS 659A.112. 42 U.S.C. § 12112.