Section 236.350 - Definitions for ORS 236.350 to 236.370

3 Citing briefs

  1. Cleavenger v. McDermed, et al.

    Motion for Summary Judgment . Oral Argument requested.

    Filed June 11, 2015

    7. UOPD Non-Compliance and Non-Implementation of State Law Plaintiff complained that he was not afforded the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (ORS 236.350-370) during his investigations because he was not given proper notice of who was conducting an investigation or the contents of the investigations, and was not always allowed to record meetings. Id., 156:21-25; 157.

  2. Cleavenger v. McDermed, et al.

    Response to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 60 Oral Argument requested.

    Filed April 30, 2015

    Plaintiff began outlining many of his potential legal claims against the defendants as early as 6/17/2012, when he filed his 12-page “Official Statement of Grievance Form” through his Union (SEIU). This grievance discussed potential claims for retaliation, discrimination, due process violations, unlawful employment practices, and specific violations of Oregon statutes (ORS 236.350-60). (Decl.

  3. Cleavenger v. McDermed, et al.

    Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Oral Argument requested.

    Filed April 6, 2015

    10. Plaintiff’s Claims for Injunctive Relief for Lack of Standing Plaintiff seeks: A permanent injunction enjoining defendants from engaging in any future discriminatory employment practices as alleged in his complaint; and A permanent injunction enjoining Defendant UOPD to adopt written procedures to implement the provisions of ORS 236.350 to 236.370 as required by law under ORS 236.