This Court should, like the Moon court, choose not to endanger the legislature’s chosen policy balance.13                                                              13 The Sixth Circuit recently addressed Burford abstention in the context of an action for both workers’ compensation and RICO claims in Jackson v. Segwick 5:14-cv-10266-JEL-DRG Doc # 45 Filed 04/07/14 Pg 63 of 78 Pg ID 712 46 Moreover, as detailed in the previous section, this is a No-Fault Act case notwithstanding State Farm’s attempts to pretend otherwise. State Farm refers to Defendants’ claims as “fraudulent” solely so as to avoid stating the obvious, i.e., that State Farm is really disputing reasonableness and medical necessity under MCL 500.3107(1)(a). Likewise, State Farm tries to twist the facts into a RICO claim simply in order to justify jurisdiction in this Court, forgetting that the Court is not required to exercise its jurisdiction under Burford.