§

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 413.140

Section 413.140 - Actions to be brought within one year
Section 413.140 - Actions to be brought within one year

5 Citing briefs

  1. Streed et al V Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et Al.,

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed May 22, 2017

    (FAC ¶¶ 25(g), 29(g)).  Kentucky: Plaintiff Coontz’ product liability, negligence, and fraud claims barred by 1 year statute of limitations. Ky. Rev. Stat. §413.140(1)(a). (FAC ¶¶ 23(g), 21(g)).  Michigan: Plaintiff Bivins’ product liability, negligence, and fraud claims barred by 3 year statute of limitations.

  2. Streed et al V Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et Al.,

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed June 15, 2017

    .......................10, 11 STATUTES 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(d), 352(f), and 355 ............................................................................................17 21 U.S.C. §337(a) ..............................................................................................................16, 17, 18 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)................................................................................................................13 A.R.S. §§ 12-551, 12-542 ..............................................................................................................25 Ala. Stat §6-2-38............................................................................................................................25 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §335.1, 340.8(a) ...........................................................................................25 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 410.10 .........................................................................................................9 Ky. Rev. Stat. §413.140(1)(a) ........................................................................................................25 MCLA §600.5805(13) ...................................................................................................................25 O.C.G.A. §9-3-33...........................................................................................................................25 Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §2305.10(A) ...............................................................................................25 S.C. Code Ann. §15-3-530, 15-3-535 ............................................................................................25 Case 3:17-cv-02609-SI Document 70 Filed 06/15/17 Page 4 of 30 iv 1110608v.2 42 Pa. Consol. Stat. §5524(2) ........................................................................................................25 Tenn. Code Ann. §28-3-104 ..........................................................................................................25

  3. Suter et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

    MOTION

    Filed July 8, 2016

    First, Plaintiffs’ negligence, product liability and loss of consortium claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Claims based on injuries to the person of a plaintiff must be filed within one year from the date the cause of action accrues under Kentucky law. See KY. REV. STAT. § 413.140(1)(a). The record shows that Plaintiffs’ claims accrued more than one year prior to the filing of this action, and are time-barred.

  4. PARRISH v. LATHAM & WATKINS

    Amicus Curiae Brief of The Los Angeles County Bar Association and Beverly Hills Bar Association

    Filed June 10, 2016

    (May 2011) 36:5 Prof. Liab. Rptr. 11 (discussing Vafi and noting similar earlier cases); Jordan, Malicious Prosecution Claims Against Attorneys Are GovernedBy Statute OfLimitations Applicable To Malpractice Claims (Nov. 2013) 38:11 Prof. Liab. Rptr. 8 (discussing Yee and prior cases). ? Alabama (Code ofAla. § 39(a)(1)), Arizona (A.R.S.§ 12-541), Kansas (K.S.A. § 60-514), Kentucky (K.R.S. § 413.140(1)(c)), Louisiana (La. Civ. Code Ann.art. 3492), Mississippi (Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-35.), New York (N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 215(3)), Ohio (Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2305.11(A)), Oklahoma (OKStat. § 12-95(4)), Tennessee (Tenn. Code § 28-3-104(a)), Texas (T.C.P.R. § 16.002(a)), Virginia (Va. Code § 8.01-248), West Virginia (Preiser v. MacQueen [W.Va. 1985] 352 S.E.2d 22, 27), Wyoming (Wyo.Stat. § 1-3- 105(a)(v)(C)).

  5. PARRISH v. LATHAM & WATKINS (To be called and continued to the June 2017 calendar.)

    Amicus Curiae Brief of The Los Angeles County Bar Association and Beverly Hills Bar Association

    Filed June 10, 2016

    (May 2011) 36:5 Prof. Liab. Rptr. 11 (discussing Vafi and noting similar earlier cases); Jordan, Malicious Prosecution Claims Against Attorneys Are GovernedBy Statute OfLimitations Applicable To Malpractice Claims (Nov. 2013) 38:11 Prof. Liab. Rptr. 8 (discussing Yee and prior cases). ? Alabama (Code ofAla. § 39(a)(1)), Arizona (A.R.S.§ 12-541), Kansas (K.S.A. § 60-514), Kentucky (K.R.S. § 413.140(1)(c)), Louisiana (La. Civ. Code Ann.art. 3492), Mississippi (Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-35.), New York (N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 215(3)), Ohio (Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2305.11(A)), Oklahoma (OKStat. § 12-95(4)), Tennessee (Tenn. Code § 28-3-104(a)), Texas (T.C.P.R. § 16.002(a)), Virginia (Va. Code § 8.01-248), West Virginia (Preiser v. MacQueen [W.Va. 1985] 352 S.E.2d 22, 27), Wyoming (Wyo.Stat. § 1-3- 105(a)(v)(C)).