As used in this section and sections 52-240a, 52-240b, 52-572n to 52-572q, inclusive, and 52-577a:
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572m
(P.A. 79-483, S. 1; 79-631, S. 106, 111; P.A. 82-160, S. 242; P.A. 84-509, S. 1; 84-546, S. 120, 173.)
Cited. 187 Conn. 363; 192 Conn. 280; 200 C. 562; 203 Conn. 156; 204 C. 399. Product liability act abrogated common law indemnification principles in this area. 205 Conn. 694. Cited. 207 Conn. 575; Id., 599; 210 Conn. 189; 212 C. 462; Id., 509; 213 Conn. 136; 216 C. 65. Loss of consortium claim is not barred in action brought pursuant to product liability act, Sec. 52-572m et seq. 226 Conn. 282. Cited. 229 C. 213; Id., 500; 232 Conn. 559; 233 C. 732; 236 C. 769; 241 Conn. 199; 243 Conn. 168. "Commercial loss" does not encompass costs incurred by a commercial party in repairing or replacing a defective product or in repairing property damage caused by a defective product; "damage to property" is not limited to property owned by the party seeking to recover. 291 C. 224. Modified consumer expectation test, recognized in 241 Conn. 199, is the primary strict product liability test; ordinary consumer expectation test is reserved for those limited cases in which product fails to meet consumer's legitimate, commonly accepted minimum safety expectations. 321 C. 172. Cited. 1 CA 48; 3 CA 230; 8 Conn.App. 642; 11 CA 391; 16 Conn.App. 558; 30 Conn.App. 664; 31 CA 824; 36 Conn.App. 601; 39 CA 635; 41 CA 555; Id., 856; 46 CA 18; Id., 699. Sidewalk constructed using form and pour method does not constitute a "product" under section. 66 CA 681. Cited. 36 CS 137; 37 CS 735. Legislative meaning attributed to words "claimant" and "harm" are sufficiently broad to permit an award of punitive damages in connection with a product liability claim involving only damage to property. 39 Conn.Supp. 269. Cause of action alleging that electricity is a product and a large surge of electricity was a defective condition in defendant's product was not improper as a matter of law and doctrine of strict liability is applicable. 40 Conn.Supp. 120. Cited. 41 Conn.Supp. 179; Id., 411; 42 Conn.Supp. 153; 44 Conn.Supp. 510. Discussion of strict tort liability on sellers of used goods; no distinction between sellers of new and used products. 45 CS 531. The two parts of the "actionable harm" test are plaintiff's discovery "that he has been injured" and "that defendant's conduct caused that injury". 46 CS 235.