131 S. Ct. 288 (2010)………………………………………………………...passim Salahuddin v. Coughlin, 781 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1986)………………………...…...12 Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. v. Lillian Krupin, 2009 N.Y Misc. LEXIS 6553, 2009 N.Y. Slip. Op. 33063 (U) (N.Y. Co., Dec. 30, 2009)...................................13n Society of Lloyd's v. Grace, 278 A.D.2d 169, 718 N.Y.S.2d 327 (1st Dep't 2000)……………………………………................................................13 Other Authorities: New York Civil Practice Law & Rules § 311………………………..………passim New York Civil Practice Law & Rules § 3213…………………………...………..1 New York Civil Practice Law & Rules § 5303……………..............….............1, 18 New York Civil Practice Law & Rules § 5602…………………………...………..1 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff-Appellant Landauer Limited [Landauer] respectfully submits this reply brief in further support of its appeal from the denial of Landauer's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR §§ 3213 and 5303 seeking enforcement of a money judgment of the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court, England rendered against Defendant- Respondent Joe Monani Fish Co. [Monani] in the amount of $368,755.49.

See R.331. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff-Appellant Landauer respectfully submits this brief on appeal from the First Department's December 27, 2012 Decision affirming the trial court's decision entered November 17, 2011, denying without prejudice Landauer's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR §§ 3213 and 5303 seeking enforcement of a money judgment of the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court, England rendered against Monani in the amount of $368,755.49. Basing their decisions on the trial court's faulty finding of 2 lack of technical service of process and in disregard of the evidence of Defendant's notice of the English action, the courts below failed to apply binding precedent requiring enforcement of this final and conclusive money judgment.