Accordingly, the judgment of the convicting court is affirmed.Brownlee v. Haley, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19069 (11th Cir 9/16/2002) "Brownlee plainly received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing in light of his attorneys' failure to investigate, obtain, or present to the jury any evidence in mitigation of the death penalty, violating the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution."If counsel had exercised Brownlee's right to present all relevant and competent mitigating evidence, the jury would have heard compelling evidence addressing two statutory mitigating circumstances -- that the crime "was committed while the defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance," Ala. Code. § 13A-5-51(2), and that "the capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law was substantially impaired," id. § 13A-5-51(6) -- as well as several significant non-statutory mitigating factors, see id.