CAR 34-35; AR 26015-16.13 This is precisely the analysis CEQA requires. Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21065, 21068; Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(2), 15125, 15378(a), 15382. Plaintiffs disagree with the Agencies’ conclusions, but have shown no defect 13 The Agencies acknowledged that the “no cropland idling alternative” would eliminate the incremental impact to GGS habitat entirely.