§

Cal. Evid. Code § 1220

Section 1220 - Statement of party opponent
Section 1220 - Statement of party opponent

3 Citing briefs

  1. McWILLIAMS v. CITY OF LONG BEACH

    Appellant’s Motion

    Filed October 29, 2012

    RACHELE R. RICKERT [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE For the reasons provided in Plaintiff’s Motion for Consideration of Additional Evidence (the “Motion’”), this Court hereby grants the Motion, specifically the following statement made by the City of Long Beach City Attorney, Robert E. Shannon, as reported in the Daily Journal article dated April 13, 2012, attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Rachele R. Rickert: “If people were left to the task of filing individual claims, they by and large wouldn’t bother.” As of the date of signing this Order, the Court will take this evidence into consideration pursuant to California Evidence Code section 1220 and California Code of Civil Procedure section 909 and in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 8.252(c)(2). The Court hereby admits this statement into evidence without a hearing.

  2. DURAN v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

    Appellant’s Answer Brief on the Merits

    Filed December 28, 2012

    First, the hearsay rule does not prevent the admission of statements made by a party opponent. Evid. Code §1220. Plaintiffs’ other arguments go to the weight of the declarations, and not whether it was .a due processviolation to exclude them. Finally,it is illogical for the Plaintiffs to claim the declarations were “cumulative” when they are probative as to whether each class memberwas properly classified.

  3. PEOPLE v. HAJEK & VO

    Appellant, Loi Tan Vo, Reply Brief

    Filed February 27, 2012

    bold (6th Cir. 2000) 226 F.3d 681 ..............0.0.. 27 Wade v. Calderon (9th Cir. 1994) 29 F.3d 1313 ......... 0.0000 0000. 97 XV Washington v. Texas (1967) 388 U.S. 14.0.0... 0... ccc ce eee 57 Welch v. Simmons (10th Cir. 2006) 451 F.3d 675 .........0..0.. 00000. 57 White v. Illinois (1992) 502 U.S. 346 2.0... ceecee eee 25 Wiggins v. Smith (2003) 539 U.S.510 2...eee45,55 Williams v. Taylor (2000) 529 U.S. 362 1.0.0... ccee 45,55 Williamson v. United States (1994) 512 U.S.594 ... 0.0... eee, 27 Wood v. Georgia (1981) 450 U.S. 261 0...eee76, 78 Woodson v. North Carolina (1976) 408 U.S. 280 ............... passim Zafiro v. United States (1993) 506 U.S. 534 2... ee eee eee 11, 14 Zant v. Stephens (1983) 462 U.S. 862 ............004. 93, 183, 184, 196 RULES AND STATUTES CALCRIM 357, Adoptive Admissions ........... 0.0.00. 0005 161, 178 California Evid. Code § 352) 60...cee 129 California Evid. Code § 664 ceeeeeeeee ees 167 California Evid. Code § 1200 cece ee eee een eee neces 185, 192 California Evid. Code § 1220 .. 0... ceecceee 192 California Evid. Code § 1221 ......... 0... cee eee 162, 179, 192 California Rules of Court, Rule 8.2200(a)(a) ............00005 82, 114, 127, 158, 208, 216, 231, 232 CALJIC 2.10oeeee ene eee eae 182 XV1 CALJIC 3.00 2...ceeeee ene 227 CALJIC 3.01 1.eectene e eens 227 CALJIC 6.10.5 2...eneeee eens 221 CALJIC 6.11 ooteee e enn nee ees 221 CALJIC 6.21 0.eeeeee n ees 217 CALJIC 8.25 21.cecetenes 94, 97 CALJIC 8.26 22.eeete eee eens 221 CALJIC 8.80.1 20.0...eeeee 106, 107, 211, 213, 214 CALJIC 8.81.15 2.eectteen teen eas 97 CALJIC 8.81.18 2.0...cecentres 208 California Penal Code § 187 ..... 0.0... ceeene 128 California Penal Code § 190.2 .... 0... 0. eee eee ee 94, 205 California Penal Code § 190.3 2.0... 0... cece eee 184, 204 California Penal Code § 190.4 2.0... 0...cece 206, 243 California Penal Code § 190.5 1... 0... ccceee nee 239 California Penal Code § 987.9... 0.0...ees 33, 45, 53 California Penal Code § 1050 2.0...kcenee 59 California Penal Code § 1054.1 2.0.