’ [Citation.]” [Citation.]’”].) Admissibility under Evidence Code section 1108 does not require that the sex offenses be similar; it is enough thecharged offense andthe prior crimes are sex offenses as defined bythe statute. (People v. Frazier (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 30, 41, 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 100.)

(17 RT 5776.) Furthermore, at the time the court admitted the statementsatissue, it had already found ® (...continued) Except as providedin this section and in Sections 1102, 1103, 1108, and 1109, evidence of a person’s characteror trait of his or her character (whetherin the form of an opinion, evidence of reputation, or evidence of specific instances of his or her conduct) is inadmissible whenoffered to prove his or her conduct on a specified occasion. 232 admissible appellant’s statement to Baker indicating that if he committed another robbery, he would kill any witnesses. (11 RT 4040-4041.)