§

Cal. Pen. Code § 836

Section 836 - Arrest with warrant and without warrant; domestic violence call
Section 836 - Arrest with warrant and without warrant; domestic violence call

4 Citing briefs

  1. PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

    Appellant’s Reply Brief on the Merits

    Filed February 23, 2012

    A peace officer may arrest a person without a warrant whenever he has probable cause to believe that the person has committed a misdemeanorin his presence. (Pen.Code, § 836, subd. 1.) A private citizen, however, may arrest another for a misdemeanor only when the offense has actually been committed or attemptedin his presence. (Pen.Code, § 837, subd. 1.) (Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 579, 587, 595 P.2d 975, 979 [emphasis added].)

  2. GARCIA (SERGIO C.) ON ADMISSION

    Amicus Curiae Brief of American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, et al.

    Filed July 27, 2012

    For example, a person mayenter the United States lawfully on a visa, but may remain beyondthe period authorized by the visa. Such a person would be present without authorization and removable, but would not have illegally entered and would not be subject to any criminal chargeas a result of the visa overstay. * Moreover, the offense of illegal entry occursat the time of entry and is not a continuing offense for which a person present without authorization could be arrested absent a warrant, unless that offense was committed in the presenceof the arresting officer. (United States v. Cores (1958) 356 U.S. 405, 408 fn. 6; Cal. Pen. Code § 836(a).) B. An Individual’s Present Lack of a Valid Immigration Status Does Not Mean He Will Be Removed.

  3. Briggs v. Borough of Norristown et al

    RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM /First Amended Complaint

    Filed June 3, 2013

    65.530 (A) Arizona Mandatory Arrest Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-3601 (B) Arkansas Pro-Arrest Ark. Code Ann. § 16-81-113 (A)(1)(A) California Pro-Arrest Cal. Penal Code § 836 (D) Colorado Mandatory Arrest Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-6-803.6 Connecticut Mandatory Arrest Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 46b-38b (A) Delaware Officer's Discretion?

  4. Johnson et al v. The County of Contra Costa et al

    Memorandum in Opposition re MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, 38 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

    Filed August 12, 2010

    6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 California Government Code, section 821.8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 California Government Code, section 900 et seq. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 California Government Code, section 26601 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 California Penal Code, section 836 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 United States Constitution, Amendment IV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Case3:09-cv-01241-WHA Document48 Filed08/12/10 Page6 of 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, JEFF MOULE AND BRIAN GARDNER- C 09-1241 1 Defendants COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA (the “County”), SHERIFF WARREN RUPF, MOULE, GARDNER, WESTERMAN, MARTINEZ, GIBSON, and VORHAUER submit this opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against County of Contra Costa, Jeff Moule and Brian Gardner. INTRODUCTION This case presents a unique question of potential liability under 42 U.SC.