Section 209 - Kidnapping for ransom, reward or to commit extortion

3 Citing briefs

  1. BUTLER

    Petitioner’s Answer Brief on the Merits

    Filed March 21, 2017

    An individual convicted offirst-degree murderin cold blood plainly merits a different sentence than an inmate found guilty of kidnapping someone without causing death or serious bodily harm or one whoplaced an obstruction in a railroad path that did not fatally hurt anyone. See Cal. Penal Code § 190(a); § 209(a); § 219. Indeed, the circumstances of Mr. Butler’s own conviction undermine the Board’s suggestion that it can constitutionally render the possibility of parole meaningless for every single one of the 9,315 life prisoners who—as of thefiling of Mr. Butler’s supplemental petition—had served sentences beyond their minimum eligible parole dates. Supp. Habeas Pet. App’x. Ex. Z (Decl. of Austin) J 24.

  2. PEOPLE v. ROUNTREE (CHARLES F.)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed September 14, 2009

    B. The Prosecution's Only Evidence For A Kidnaping Was Mr. Rountree's Redacted Statements. Mr. Rountree was charged with kidnaping under Penal Code sections 207 and 209, and as a special circumstance within the meaning of Penal 155 Code section 190.2. (l CT 2-5.)

  3. PEOPLE v. SATTIEWHITE (CHRISTOPHER)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed July 18, 2008

    Pennsylvania (2003)537U.S.101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 Schad v. Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1991)501U.S.624 220,221 Shafer v. South Carolina (2001)532U.S.36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191,194 Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina (9th Cir. 1992) 965 F.2d 699 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .86,236 Simmons v. South Carolina (1 994) 5 12 U.S. 154 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . passim Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)316U.S.535 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 Skipper v. South Carolina (1986)476U.S.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . passim Smith v. Phillips (1982)455U.S.209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 Smith v. Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2004)543U.S.37 213 xxii South Carolina v. Gathers (1989)490U.S.805 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492U.S.361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 Strickland v. Washington (1984)466U.S.668 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Strickler v. Greene (1999) 527 U.S. 263 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176, 177 Stringer v. Black (1 992) 503 U.S. 222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,260 Sullivan v. Louisiana (1993) 508 U.S. 275 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .