Rule 166a - Summary Judgment

2 Citing briefs

  1. Burson v. Evanston Insurance Company

    Response in Opposition to Motion

    Filed November 9, 2017

    23. 35 Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 78- 80, 58 S. Ct. 817, 82 L. Ed. 1188 (1938) 36 Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c); Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. Steel, 997 S.W.2d 217, 222 (Tex. 1999); Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211, 216 (Tex. 2003); Haase v. Glazner, 62 S.W.3d 795, 797, 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 141 (Tex. 2001). 37 Neely v. Wilson, 418 S.W.3d 52, 59 (Tex. 2013).

  2. Breitling et al v. LNV Corporation et al

    RESPONSE AND OBJECTION

    Filed December 18, 2015

    ; Davis v. U.S. Gov't, 742 F.2d 171, 173 (5th Cir. 1984); Deramus v. Resolution Trust Corp., 111 F. App'x 766 (5th Cir. 2004) (granting of summary judgment did not deny due process); Johnson v. Texas Serenity Acad., Inc., No. 01-14-00438-CV, 2015 WL 1135947, at *5 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 12, 2015, no pet.) ("summary judgment under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a does not deprive a party of the constitutional right to a jury trial."); Alvarado v. Boyles, No. 07-11-00483-CV, 2013 WL 2247325, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 17, 2013, no pet.)