N.M. R. Prof'l. Cond. 16-703
N.M. R. Prof'l. Cond. 16-703
Committee commentary. -
[1] Paragraph B prohibits a lawyer from soliciting professional 16 employment by live person-to-person contact when a significant motive for the lawyer's doing so 17 is the lawyer's or the firm's pecuniary gain. A lawyer's communication is not a solicitation if it is directed to the general public, such as through a billboard, an Internet banner advertisement, a website or a television commercial, or if it is in response to a request for information, or is automatically generated in response to electronic searches.
[2] Live person-to-person contact" means in-person, face-to-face, live telephone and other real-time visual or auditory person-to-person communications, where the person is subject to a direct personal encounter without time for reflection. That person-to-person contact does not include chat rooms, text messages or other written communications that recipients may easily disregard. A potential for overreaching exists when a lawyer, seeking pecuniary gain, solicits a person known to be in need of legal services. This forms of contact subjects a person to the private importuning of the trained advocate in a direct interpersonal encounter. The person, who may already feel overwhelmed by the circumstances giving rise to the need for legal services, may find it difficult to fully evaluate all available alternatives with reasoned judgment and appropriate self-interest in the face of the lawyer's presence and insistence on an immediate response. The situation is fraught with the possibility of undue influence, intimidation and overreaching.
[3] There is far less likelihood that a lawyer would engage in against a former client or a person with whom the lawyer has a close personal family, business, or professional relationship or in situations in which the lawyer is motivated by considerations other than the lawyer's pecuniary gain. Nor is there a serious potential for overreaching when the person contacted is a lawyer. or is a person known by the lawyer to be 15 experienced with the use or retention of related legal services. For instance, an "experienced user" 16 of legal services may include those who hire outside counsel to represent the entity; entrepreneurs 17 who regularly engage business, employment law, or intellectual property lawyers; insurance 18 claims professionals who regularly engage with lawyers; small business proprietors who hire 19 lawyers for lease or contract issues; and other people who retain lawyers for business transactions 20 or formations. Paragraph B is not intended to prohibit a lawyer from participating in constitutionally protected activities of public or charitable legal-service organizations or bona fide political, social, civic, fraternal, employee or trade organizations whose purposes include providing or recommending legal services to their members or beneficiaries.
[4] A solicitation that contains (1) that contains false or misleading information that is false or misleading within the meaning of Rule 16-701 NMRA; (2) that involves coercion, duress or harassment within the meaning of Rule 16-703(C)(2) NMRA or (3) that involves contact with someone who has made known to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited by the lawyer within the meaning of Rule 16-703(C)(1) NMRA is prohibited. Live, person-to-person contact of individuals who may be especially 14 vulnerable to coercion or duress is ordinarily not appropriate, for example, the elderly, those whose 15 first language is not English, or the disabled.
[5] This rule dose not prohibit a lawyer from contacting representatives of organizations or groups that may be interested in establishing a group or prepaid legal plan for their members, insureds, beneficiaries or other third parties for the purpose of informing such entities of the availability of and details concerning the plan or arrangement that the lawyer or lawyer's firm is willing to offer. This form of communication is not directed to people who are seeking legal services for themselves. Rather, it is usually addressed to an individual acting in a fiduciary capacity seeking a supplier of legal services for others who may, if they choose, become prospective clients of the lawyer. Under these circumstances, the activity that the lawyer undertakes in communicating with such representatives and the type of information transmitted to the individual are functionally similar to and serve the same purpose as advertising permitted under Rule 16-702 NMRA.
[6] Communications authorized by law or ordered by a court or a tribunal include a notice to potential members of a class in class action litigation.
[7] Paragraph D of this rule permits a lawyer to participate with an organization that uses personal contact to enroll members for its group or prepaid legal service plan, provided that the personal contact is not undertaken by any lawyer who would be a provider of legal services through the plan. The organization must not be owned by or directed (whether as manager or otherwise) by any lawyer or law firm that participates in the plan. For example, Paragraph D would not permit a lawyer to create an organization controlled directly or indirectly by the lawyer and use the organization for the person-to-person solicitation of legal employment of the lawyer through memberships in the plan or otherwise. The communication permitted by these organizations also must not be directed to a person known to need legal services in a particular matter, but must be designed to inform potential plan members generally of another means of affordable legal services. Lawyers who participate in a legal service plan must reasonably assure that the plan sponsors are in compliance with Rules 16-701, 16-702, and 16-703(B) NMRA.
[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 08-8300-029, effective November 3, 2008; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 15-8300-007, effective December 31, 2015; as amended by Supreme 5 Court Order No. 21-8300-014, effective December 31, 2021.
.ANNOTATIONS The 2015 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 15-8300-007, effective December 31, 2015, in the heading, deleted "Direct contact with prospective" and added "Solicitation of"; in Paragraph A, after "professional employment", deleted "from a prospective client"; in the introductory sentence of Paragraph B, after "professional employment", deleted "from a prospective client"; in Subparagraph B(1), deleted "prospective client" and added "target of the solicitation"; in Paragraph C, after "professional employment from", deleted "a prospective client" and added "anyone", and after "Subparagraphs", deleted "(1) or (2) of Paragraph A" and added "(A)(1) or (2)"; and revised the committee commentary to define "solicitation" and to provide examples of what type of communication is permitted under this rule, and made stylistic changes throughout. The 2008 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 08-8300-29, effective November 3, 2008, deleted "in-person or telephone" in the title; deleted former provisions of the rule which permitted a lawyer or a lawyer's agent to engage in the in-person or telephone solicitation of business if the prospective client is a relative or the lawyer has a prior personal business or professional relationship with the prospective client or if the communication is made under the auspices of a public or charitable legal organization or other organizations whose purposes include providing or recommending legal services; and added new Paragraphs A through D. The 1992 amendment, effective for all lawyer advertisements mailed, displayed or broadcast on and after August 1, 1992, rewrote the introductory paragraph and Paragraph A; added present Paragraph B; and deleted former Paragraphs B and C, relating to exceptions to permitted solicitations and advertising designations, respectively.