Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2004, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2009.)
An answer that raises additional issues for review must contain a concise, nonargumentative statement of those issues, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2011; adopted as subd (e); previously relettered effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.)
(Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2024; Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted as subd (f); previously relettered effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.)
Cal. R. Ct. 8.504
Advisory Committee Comment
Subdivision (d). Subdivision (d) states in terms of word counts rather than page counts the maximum permissible lengths of a petition for review, answer, or reply produced on a computer. This provision tracks a provision in rule 8.204(c) governing Court of Appeal briefs and is explained in the advisory committee comment to that provision. Subdivision (d)(3) specifies certain items that are not counted toward the maximum length of a petition, answer, or reply. Signature blocks, as referenced in this provision include not only the signatures, but also the printed names, titles, and affiliations of any attorneys filing or joining in the petition, answer, or reply, which may accompany the signature.