The intent of this rule is to promote uniformity in the practices and procedures relating to telephone appearances in civil cases. To improve access to the courts and reduce litigation costs, courts should permit parties, to the extent feasible, to appear by telephone at appropriate conferences, hearings, and proceedings in civil cases.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2008.)
Subdivisions (c) through (i) of this rule are suspended from January 1, 2022, to January 1, 2026, during which time the provisions in rule 3.672 apply in their place. This rule applies to all general civil cases as defined in rule 1.6 and to unlawful detainer and probate proceedings.
(Subd (b) amended effective August 4, 2023; previously repealed and adopted as subd (a) effective July 1, 1998; previously relettered effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective January 1, 1999, January 1, 2001, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2022..)
Except as ordered by the court under (f)(2) and subject to (d) (regarding ex parte applications) and (h) (regarding notice), all parties, including moving parties, may appear by telephone at all conferences, hearings, and proceedings other than those where personal appearances are required under (e).
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2014; previously repealed and adopted as subd (b) effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 1999, and January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (c) effective January 1, 2008.)
Except as ordered by the court under (f)(2) and subject to (h), applicants seeking an ex parte order may appear by telephone provided that the moving papers have been filed and a proposed order submitted by at least 10:00 a.m. two court days before the ex parte appearance and, if required by local rule, copies have been provided directly to the department in which the matter is to be considered.
Even if the applicant has not complied with (1), except as ordered by the court under (f)(2) and subject to the provisions in (h), parties opposing an ex parte order may appear by telephone.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2014.)
At the proceedings described under (2), parties who are not required to appear in person under this rule may appear by telephone.
(Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (c) effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (d) effective January 1, 2008..)
In exercising its discretion under this provision, the court should consider the general policy favoring telephone appearances in civil cases.
The court may require a party to appear in person at a hearing, conference, or proceeding listed in (c) or (d) if the court determines on a hearing-by-hearing basis that a personal appearance would materially assist in the determination of the proceedings or in the effective management or resolution of the particular case.
The court may permit a party to appear by telephone at a hearing, conference, or proceeding under (e) if the court determines that a telephone appearance is appropriate.
(Subd (f) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (e) effective January 1, 2008..)
If, at any time during a hearing, conference, or proceeding conducted by telephone, the court determines that a personal appearance is necessary, the court may continue the matter and require a personal appearance.
(Subd (g) relettered effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (f) effective January 1, 12 2008.)
(Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (d) effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 1999, July 1, 1999, January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered subd (g) effective January 1, 2008, and subd (h) effective January 1, 2014.)
After a party has requested a telephone appearance under (h), if the court requires the personal appearance of the party, the court must give reasonable notice to all parties before the hearing and may continue the hearing if necessary to accommodate the personal appearance. The court may direct the court clerk, a court-appointed vendor, a party, or an attorney to provide the notification. In courts using a telephonic tentative ruling system for law and motion matters, court notification that parties must appear in person may be given as part of the court's tentative ruling on a specific law and motion matter if that notification is given one court day before the hearing.
(Subd (i) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2008.)
A party that has received a fee waiver must not be charged the fees for telephone appearances.
To obtain telephone services without payment of a telephone appearance fee from a vendor or a court that provides telephone appearance services, a party must advise the vendor or the court that he or she has received a fee waiver from the court. If a vendor requests, the party must transmit a copy of the order granting the fee waiver to the vendor.
If a party based on a fee waiver receives telephone appearance services under this rule without payment of a fee, the vendor or court that provides the telephone appearance services has a lien on any judgment, including a judgment for costs, that the party may receive, in the amount of the fee that the party would have paid for the telephone appearance. There is no charge for filing the lien.
(Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2023; adopted as subd (k) effective July 1, 2011; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2014.)
If a court provides telephone appearance services in a proceeding for child or family support under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act brought by or otherwise involving a local child support agency, the court must not charge a fee for those services.
When a party in a Title IV-D proceeding requests telephone appearance services from a court or a vendor, the party requesting the services must advise the court or the vendor that the requester is a party in a proceeding for child or family support under Title IV-D brought by or otherwise involving a local child support agency.
The fee waiver provisions in (j) apply to a request by a party in a Title IV-D proceeding for telephone appearance services from a vendor.
(Subd (m) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (l) effective July 1, 2011; previously amended effective July 1, 2013.)
The court must ensure that the statements of participants are audible to all other participants and the court staff and that the statements made by a participant are identified as being made by that participant.
(Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2023; adopted as subd (f); previously amended 29 effective January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as 30 subd (j) effective January 1, 2008; previously relettered as subd (c) effective January 1, 31 1989, as subd (g) effective July 1, 1998, as subd (m) effective July 1, 2011; and as subd (n) 32 effective January 1, 2014.)
All proceedings involving telephone appearances must be reported to the same extent and in the same manner as if the participants had appeared in person.
(Subd (m) relettered effective January 1, 2023; adopted as subd (h) effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously relettered as subd (k) effective January 1, 2008, as subd (n) effective July 1, 2011; as subd (o) effective January 1, 2014.)
A court, by local rule, may designate a particular conference call provider that must be used for telephone appearances.
(Subd (n) relettered effective January 1, 2023; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2003; previously relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2008; and as subd (p) effective January 1, 2014; previously amended and relettered as subd (o) effective July 1, 2011.)
The court must publish notice providing parties with the particular information necessary for them to appear by telephone at conferences, and hearings, and proceedings in that court under this rule.
(Subd (o) relettered effective January 1, 2023; adopted as subd (j); previously amended effective January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008; previously relettered as subd (p) effective July 1, 2011; and as subd (q) effective January 1, 2014.)
Cal. R. Ct. 3.670
Advisory Committee Comment
This rule does not apply to criminal or juvenile matters, and it also does not apply to family law matters, except in certain respects as provided in rule 5.324 relating to telephone appearances in proceedings for child or family support under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act . (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(b) [rule applies to general civil cases and unlawful detainer and probate proceedings]; rule 5.324(j) [subdivisions (i)-(p) of rule 3.670 apply to telephone appearances in Title IV-D proceedings].)
Subdivision (d). The inclusion of ex parte applications in this rule is intended to address only the way parties may appear and is not intended to alter the way courts handle ex parte applications.
Subdivision (h). Under subdivision (h)(6), good cause should be construed consistent with the policy in (a) and in Code of Civil Procedure section 367.5(a) favoring telephone appearances. Some examples of good cause to appear by telephone without notice include personal or family illness, death in the family, natural disasters, and unexpected transportation delays or interruption.
.