As used in this rule,
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016.)
If made in the alternative, a motion for summary adjudication may make reference to and depend on the same evidence submitted in support of the summary judgment motion. If summary adjudication is sought, whether separately or as an alternative to the motion for summary judgment, the specific cause of action, affirmative defense, claims for damages, or issues of duty must be stated specifically in the notice of motion and be repeated, verbatim, in the separate statement of undisputed material facts.
Except as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(r) and rule 3.1351, the motion must contain and be supported by the following documents:
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008.)
Except as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(r) and rule 3.1351, the opposition to a motion must consist of the following separate documents, titled as shown:
(Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2009.)
The Separate Statement in Opposition to Motion must be in the two-column format specified in (h).
(Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2002.)
If evidence in support of or in opposition to a motion exceeds 25 pages, the evidence must be separately bound and must include a table of contents.
Supporting and opposing separate statements in a motion for summary judgment must follow this format:
Supporting statement: | |
Moving Party's Undisputed Material Facts and Supporting Evidence: | Opposing Party's Response and Supporting Evidence: |
1. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract for the sale of widgets. declaration. Jackson declaration, 2:17-21; contract, Ex. A to Jackson declaration. | |
2. No widgets were ever received. Jackson declaration, 3:7-21. | |
Opposing statement: | |
Moving Party's Undisputed Material Facts and Alleged Supporting Evidence: | Opposing Party's Response and Evidence: |
1. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract for the sale of widgets. Jackson declaration, 2:17-21; contract, Ex. A to Jackson declaration. | Undisputed. |
2. No widgets were ever received. Jackson declaration, 3:7-21. | Disputed. The widgets were received in New Zealand on August 31, 2001. Baygi declaration, 7:2-5. |
Supporting and opposing separate statements in a motion for summary adjudication must follow this format:
Supporting statement:
ISSUE-1
THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE IS BARRED
BECAUSE PLAINTIFF EXPRESSLY ASSUMED THE RISK OF INJURY
Moving Party's Undisputed Material Facts and Supporting Evidence: | Opposing Party's Response and Supporting Evidence: |
1. Plaintiff was injured while mountain climbing on a trip with Any Company USA. Plaintiff's deposition, 12:3-4. | |
2. Before leaving on the mountain climbing trip, plaintiff signed a waiver of liability for acts of negligence. Smith declaration, 5:4-5; waiver of liability, Ex. A to Smith declaration. | |
Opposing statement:
ISSUE-1
THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE IS BARRED
BECAUSE PLAINTIFF EXPRESSLY ASSUMED THE RISK OF INJURY
Moving Party's Undisputed Material Facts and Supporting Evidence: | Opposing Party's Response and Supporting Evidence: |
1. Plaintiff was injured while mountain climbing on a trip with Any Company USA. Plaintiff's deposition, 12:3-4. | Undisputed. |
2. Before leaving on the mountain climbing trip, plaintiff signed a waiver of liability for acts of negligence. Smith declaration, 5:4-5; waiver of liability, Ex. A to Smith declaration. | Disputed. Plaintiff did not sign the waiver of liability; the signature on the waiver is forged. Jones declaration, 3:6-7. |
(Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2002.)
On request, a party must within three days provide to any other party or the court an electronic version of its separate statement. The electronic version may be provided in any form on which the parties agree. If the parties are unable to agree on the form, the responding party must provide to the requesting party the electronic version of the separate statement that it used to prepare the document filed with the court. Under this subdivision, a party is not required to create an electronic version or any new version of any document for the purpose of transmission to the requesting party.
Cal. R. Ct. 3.1350
Advisory Committee Comment
Subdivision (a)(2). This definition is derived from statements in L.A. Nat. Bank v. Bank of Canton (1991) 229 Cal. App. 3d 1267, 1274 ("In order to prevent the imposition of a summary judgment, the disputed facts must be 'material,' i.e., relate to a claim or defense in issue which could make a difference in the outcome.") and Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 532-533 (Parties are encouraged "to raise only meritorious objections to items of evidence that are legitimately in dispute and pertinent to the disposition of the summary judgment motion.")
Subdivisions (d)(2) and (f)(3). Consistent with Reid, supra, these provisions are intended to eliminate from separate statements facts that are not material, and, thereby reduce the number of unnecessary objections to evidence.
.