On July 30, 2010 The Board denied Agoro motion to reopen seeking to apply for Asylum, and related Relief's based on changed circumstances arising in the Country of Nationality. The Board also noted that Agoro had not submitted an Asylum Application, which is required in support of a motion to reopen pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Section 1003.2 (C) (1), Also The Board concluded that it would decline To revisit Agoro's challenge to his underlining removal order, and would Decline to revisit his Ineffective Assistance of Counsel claim as well, stating Further that Agoro had not complied with matter of Lozada 19 1 & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988).