4 Citing briefs
Miles v. American Red Cross
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support
Filed March 24, 2017
207(e), Miles cites 29 C.F.R. § 825.702(a) and 29 C.F.R. § 1630.1(c)(2) in support of her claim that her termination interfered with FMLA-protected rights. (Compl.
Choice v. Csx Transportation
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Opposition Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
Filed March 3, 2017
The implementing Regulations for the ADAAA clarify that its primary purpose ‘is to make it easier for people with disabilities to obtain protection under the ADA. 29 C.F.R. § 1630.1(c)(4).” Caporicci v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 189 F.Supp.3d 1314, 1322-23 (2016).
JANKEY v. LEE
Appellant, Les Jankey, Opening Brief on the Merits
Filed June 10, 2010
Rather than dissecting the fee provision as did Hubbard, when Section 55's role and purpose within the CDPA is considered,it represents precisely the kind of state law authorized by 42 U.S.C, section 12201(b)-a law where “the potential available remedies would be greater than those available under the ADA....” (Appen. to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.1, subds. (b)(c) (2009), p. 369.
JANKEY v. LEE
Appellant, Les Jankey, Petition for Review
Filed March 11, 2010
when Section 55's role and purpose within the CDPAis considered, it represents precisely the kind ofstate law au- thorized by 42 U.S.C. section 12201(b)--a law where "the potential available remedies would be greater than those available under the ADA...." (Appen. to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.1, subds. (b)(c) (2009), p. 369.