m “unauthorized” is to be interpreted. Under prior law, some individuals were eligible for work authorization while they were in the process of seeking certain forms of immigration relief. It’s not yet clear whether President Trump intends for this order to deny work authorization to individuals in those circumstances.Earlier expiration of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans: In a February 3, 2025 Federal Register notice, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced that she had vacated a January 10, 2025 decision regarding TPS for Venezuelans, effectively revoking an 18-month extension of such protection issued in the final weeks of the Biden Administration. Advocates contend that DHS lacks the authority to do so, and high-profile legal challenges are likely to follow.Footnotes[1] Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020).[2] Texas v. United States, 50 F.4th 498, 524 (5th Cir. 2022).[3] Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, 87 Fed. Reg. 53152 (Aug. 30, 2022).[4] Texas, 50 F.4th at 512, 531–32.[5] Texas v. United States, No. 23-40653, 2025 WL 227244 (5th Cir. Jan. 17, 2025).[View source.]

16 (December 2018), https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf (citing Joy Buolamwini & Timnit Gebru, Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification, Proceedings of machine learning research (2018), http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html).[4] Liane Colonna, Legal Implications of Using AI as an Exam Invigilator, Stockholm Faculty of Law Research Paper Series no. 91 (May 5, 2021), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3839287.[5] See Sharon Goldman, Why generative AI legal battles are brewing, The AI Beat, VentureBeat (Oct. 21, 2022), https://venturebeat.com/ai/why-generative-ai-legal-battles-are-brewing-the-ai-beat/.[6] See Texas v. United States, No. 18-cv-00068 (S.D. Tex., filed May 1, 2018).[7] See Texas v. United States, 86 F. Supp. 3d 591, 604 (S.D. Tex. 2015).[8] Texas v. United States, 549 F. Supp. 3d 572, 624 (S.D. Tex. 2021); Texas v. United States, 50 F.4th 498, 528 (5th Cir. 2022).[9] See Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, 87 Fed. Reg. 53152-01 (Aug. 30, 2022) (to be codified at 8 C.F.R. pts 106, 236, and 274a).[10] NCAA v. Alston, 141 S. Ct. 2141 (2021).[11] In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, 4:20-cv-03919-CW (N.D. Cal., filed June 15, 2020).[12] Kevin Harrish, Big Ten potential conference expansion legal problems revealed, The Comeback (Aug. 4, 2022), https://thecomeback.com/ncaa/big-ten-conference-realignment-legal-problems-pac-12.html.[13] James Parks, College football realignment: CA Regents to discuss litigation amid UCLA move, Fan Nation Sports Illustrated (July 12, 2022), https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/ncaa-football/college-football-realignment-ucla-big-ten-regents-legal-issues.[14] Corzo, et al. v. Brown University, et al., 1:22-cv-00125 (N.D. Ill., filed Jan. 9, 2022).[15] No. 22-cv-1223 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 8, 2022).[16] Oral argument in the case was recently postponed from January 18, 2023, to February 15, 2023. Id. at Dkt. 68 (Jan. 17, 2023).[17] Babak G. Yousefzadeh & Skyler Hicks, What the Third Circuit’s Loom