16 (December 2018), https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf (citing Joy Buolamwini & Timnit Gebru, Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification, Proceedings of machine learning research (2018), http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html).[4] Liane Colonna, Legal Implications of Using AI as an Exam Invigilator, Stockholm Faculty of Law Research Paper Series no. 91 (May 5, 2021), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3839287.[5] See Sharon Goldman, Why generative AI legal battles are brewing, The AI Beat, VentureBeat (Oct. 21, 2022), https://venturebeat.com/ai/why-generative-ai-legal-battles-are-brewing-the-ai-beat/.[6] See Texas v. United States, No. 18-cv-00068 (S.D. Tex., filed May 1, 2018).[7] See Texas v. United States, 86 F. Supp. 3d 591, 604 (S.D. Tex. 2015).[8] Texas v. United States, 549 F. Supp. 3d 572, 624 (S.D. Tex. 2021); Texas v. United States, 50 F.4th 498, 528 (5th Cir. 2022).[9] See Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, 87 Fed. Reg. 53152-01 (Aug. 30, 2022) (to be codified at 8 C.F.R. pts 106, 236, and 274a).[10] NCAA v. Alston, 141 S. Ct. 2141 (2021).[11] In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, 4:20-cv-03919-CW (N.D. Cal., filed June 15, 2020).[12] Kevin Harrish, Big Ten potential conference expansion legal problems revealed, The Comeback (Aug. 4, 2022), https://thecomeback.com/ncaa/big-ten-conference-realignment-legal-problems-pac-12.html.[13] James Parks, College football realignment: CA Regents to discuss litigation amid UCLA move, Fan Nation Sports Illustrated (July 12, 2022), https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/ncaa-football/college-football-realignment-ucla-big-ten-regents-legal-issues.[14] Corzo, et al. v. Brown University, et al., 1:22-cv-00125 (N.D. Ill., filed Jan. 9, 2022).[15] No. 22-cv-1223 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 8, 2022).[16] Oral argument in the case was recently postponed from January 18, 2023, to February 15, 2023. Id. at Dkt. 68 (Jan. 17, 2023).[17] Babak G. Yousefzadeh & Skyler Hicks, What the Third Circuit’s Loom