25 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,691 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,746 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.

    500 U.S. 90 (1991)   Cited 1,234 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding parties' legal theories not binding on Court, which "retains the independent power to identify and apply the proper construction of governing law"
  4. Migdal v. Rowe Price-Fleming Intern., Inc.

    248 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 717 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “Rule 12(b) requires more than the mere recitation of boilerplate statutory language”
  5. Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox

    464 U.S. 523 (1984)   Cited 290 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no demand prerequisite for § 36(b) claims
  6. Jones v. Harris Associates

    559 U.S. 335 (2010)   Cited 89 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that deference is due where a board's process “for negotiating and reviewing investment-adviser compensation is robust”
  7. Pereira v. Farace

    413 F.3d 330 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 165 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Great-West impacted Seventh Amendment analysis of restitution as legal or equitable remedy
  8. Amron v. Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.

    464 F.3d 338 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 139 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in opposing a motion to dismiss, "bald assertions and conclusions of law will not suffice"
  9. Hoffman v. Ubs-Ag

    591 F. Supp. 2d 522 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 39 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring securities claims relating to funds that plaintiffs did not own
  10. Jones v. Harris Assocs. L.P.

    611 F. App'x 359 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 15 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding upon remand from the Supreme Court that "Plaintiffs have not proffered evidence that would tend to show that [the investment adviser] provided pension funds (and other non-public clients) with the same sort of services that it provided to the [mutual] funds, or that it incurred the same costs when serving different types of clients"
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,831 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Section 80a-35 - Breach of fiduciary duty

    15 U.S.C. § 80a-35   Cited 311 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a “fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for services, or of payments of a material nature ”