§Why CasetextPricing

Zink et al v. Lombardi et al

MOTION for extension of time Motion to Amend Scheduling Order

20 Cited authorities

  1. West v. Atkins

    487 U.S. 42 (1988)   Cited 34,303 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state's delegation of its duty to provide medical care to prisoners rendered a contract physician a state actor

  2. Panetti v. Quarterman

    551 U.S. 930 (2007)   Cited 1,985 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a petition raising a previously unripe claim of incompetency was not a second or successive petition under AEDPA

  3. Washington v. Glucksberg

    521 U.S. 702 (1997)   Cited 2,629 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no fundamental right to physician-assisted suicide

  4. Baze v. Rees

    553 U.S. 35 (2008)   Cited 1,035 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Eighth Amendment context that the government's choice of drug can violate the Constitution

  5. Ford v. Wainwright

    477 U.S. 399 (1986)   Cited 1,275 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that executing insane prisoners violated the Eighth Amendment

  6. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks

    532 F.3d 709 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 864 times
    Holding courts may deny leave to amend for futility

  7. Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dep't of Revenue

    553 U.S. 16 (2008)   Cited 60 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that where constitutionally sufficient link between taxing State and value it wishes to tax is founded on State's contacts with source of value, "apportioned tax base should be determined by applying the State's ... apportionment formula" to entity that is source of value

  8. Williams v. Hobbs

    658 F.3d 842 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that the prisoners, who argued that the Arkansas Method of Execution Act violated the due process clause because its secrecy denied them “an opportunity to litigate” their claim that the execution protocol violated the Eighth Amendment, failed to state a plausible due process access-to-the-courts claim

  9. Badahman v. Catering St. Louis

    395 S.W.3d 29 (Mo. 2013)   Cited 98 times
    Upholding a 3:1 ratio

  10. In re Kemmler

    136 U.S. 436 (1890)   Cited 481 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that punishment of death by electrocution does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which, like the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, "requires that no different or higher punishment shall be imposed upon one than is imposed upon all for like offenses. . . . [b]ut was not designed to interfere with the power of the State to protect the lives, liberties, and property of its citizens"

  11. Section 353 - Exemptions and consideration for certain drugs, devices, and biological products

    21 U.S.C. § 353   Cited 298 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a prescription drug label to bear the symbol "Rx only"

  12. Section 822 - Persons required to register

    21 U.S.C. § 822   Cited 206 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Addressing registration and conditions governing the authorized distribution of controlled substances

  13. Section 829 - Prescriptions

    21 U.S.C. § 829   Cited 170 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing prescriptions for drugs on Schedule II, III, IV, and V only

  14. Section 1308.14 - Schedule IV

    21 C.F.R. § 1308.14   Cited 49 times
    Classifying alprazolam as a Schedule IV substance