§Why CasetextPricing

Zhang Ziyi v. China Free Press Inc et al

REPLY In Support EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Supplement Special Motion to Strike 39

13 Cited authorities

  1. St. Amant v. Thompson

    390 U.S. 727 (1968)   Cited 1,779 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to show actual malice, plaintiff must show "high degree of awareness of probably falsity"

  2. Batzel v. Smith

    333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 363 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion is appealable under § 1291

  3. Frederick S. Wyle Professional Corp. v. Texaco, Inc.

    764 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 235 times
    Holding that evidence available before disposition of a motion for summary judgment precludes reconsideration on that basis

  4. Ampex Corp. v. Cargle

    128 Cal.App.4th 1569 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 100 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that Yahoo!'s message board for Ampex is a public forum for purposes of section 425.16

  5. Annette F. v. Sharon S.

    119 Cal.App.4th 1146 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 96 times
    Stating a public controversy "mean a dispute that in fact has received pubic attention . . . was being debated publically and . . . had foreseeable and substantial ramifications for nonparticipants"

  6. Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co.

    610 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 20 times
    Vacating lower court's decision and remanding for reconsideration in light of an intervening Supreme Court decision

  7. Cruz v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

    Case Nos. 07-2050 SC, 07-4012 SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2011)   Cited 5 times
    Dismissing opt-in plaintiffs' claims without prejudice and tolling statute of limitations for 120 days

  8. Graham-Sult v. Clainos

    No. C 10-04877 CW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    No. C 10-04877 CW. June 24, 2011 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CLAINOS'S ANTI-SLAPP MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES (Docket No. 33); GRANTING GREENE DEFENDANTS' ANTISLAPP MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES (Docket No. 27) AND DENYING AS MOOT THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 28); GRANTING BGA DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 23); AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD (Docket No. 85) CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge Pursuant to California Code of Civil

  9. Bell v. City of Los Angeles

    835 F. Supp. 2d 836 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

    No. CV 10–5823 AHM (JCGx). 2011-12-20 BELL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. Stratton Scott Barbee, Law Office of Stratton S. Barbee, Elk Grove, CA, for Bell. Elizabeth Anne Mitchell, Office of City Attorney, Wendy C. Shapero, Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for City of Los Angeles, et al. A. HOWARD MATZ Stratton Scott Barbee, Law Office of Stratton S. Barbee, Elk Grove, CA, for Bell. Elizabeth Anne Mitchell, Office of City Attorney, Wendy C. Shapero, Los Angeles City Attorney's

  10. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 331,402 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  11. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 49,437 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  12. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,480 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  13. Section 425.16 - California anti-SLAPP law

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16   Cited 2,881 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Reversing district court's denial of anti-SLAPP motion as moot and remanding for consideration of the motion, including attorney's fees