No. 87-2967. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1988. Decided November 10, 1988. Edward P. Ballinger, Brown Bain, Phoenix, Ariz., for creditor-appellant. Charles W. Lowe, Davis Lowe, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before SCHROEDER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Albert Lee Stephens, Jr., Senior District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation

No. 11-15403 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01037-JCM-RJJ 10-24-2012 In re: LAKE AT LAS VEGAS JOINT VENTURE, LLC, Debtor, LID ACQUISITION, LLC, Appellant, v. LAKE AT LAS VEGAS JOINT VENTURE, LLC; TRANSCONTINENTAL CORPORATION; OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS; LLV-1, LLC; CREDIT SUISSE, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, Appellees. NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court

No. 3:11-cv-00519-ST 08-31-2011 ZELPRO ASSEMBLY SOLUTIONS, LLC et al., Plaintiffs, v. STINGL PRODUCTS, LLC, et al., Defendants. MICHAEL W. MOSMAN OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J., On August 5, 2011, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [25] in the above-captioned case recommending that the motion to intervene filed by NAC Group, Inc. [15] be granted. No objections were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party

No. 54465, CA 14606 Argued and submitted October 12, 1979 Affirmed March 24, 1980 Appeal from Circuit Court, Linn County. Wendell H. Tompkins, Judge. James C. Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem. Richard L. King, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. Before Tanzer, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Campbell, Judges. TANZER, P

No. 76-212, CA 10597 Argued October 23, 1978 Affirmed January 15, 1979 Appeal from the Circuit Court, Douglas County, Don H. Sanders, Judge. Melinda L. Bruce, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem. F. William Honsowetz, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent Homemakers Finance and Real Estate Loans. With him on the brief was Gardner, Honsowetz Johnson, Eugene

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (3) and (4) of this section, this chapter applies to: (a) A transaction, regardless of its form, that creates a security interest in personal property or fixtures by contract; (b) An agricultural lien; (c) A sale of accounts, chattel paper, payment intangibles or promissory notes; (d) A consignment; (e) A security interest arising under ORS 72.4010, 72.5050, 72.7110(3), or 72A.5080(5), as provided in ORS 79.0110; and (f) A security interest arising

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section and ORS 79.0312(2), a financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests and agricultural liens. (2) The filing of a financing statement is not necessary to perfect a security interest: (a) That is perfected under ORS 79.0308(4), (5), (6) or (7); (b) That is perfected under ORS 79.0309 when it attaches; (c) In property subject to a statute, regulation or treaty described in ORS 79.0311(1); (d) In goods in possession

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter and in ORS 72.4030(2): (a) A security interest or agricultural lien continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, lease, license, exchange or other disposition thereof unless the secured party authorized the disposition free of the security interest or agricultural lien; and (b) A security interest attaches to any identifiable proceeds of collateral. (2) Proceeds that are commingled with other property are identifiable proceeds: (a) If the proceeds

Any bona fide assignment of a chose in action by way of sale or pledge made in writing for a good, valuable and adequate consideration is deemed completed at the time the writing is executed by the assignor and takes effect at the time of execution according to the terms of the writing without the giving of notice to the debtor therein mentioned unless such notice is required by statute; but if notice is not given to a debtor, and such debtor, without knowledge of the assignment pays or discharges

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, a security agreement may create or provide for a security interest in after-acquired collateral. (2) A security interest does not attach under a term constituting an after-acquired property clause to: (a) Consumer goods, other than an accession when given as additional security, unless the debtor acquires rights in them within 10 days after the secured party gives value; or (b) A commercial tort claim. (3) A security agreement may