34 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 267,813 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 280,791 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Starr v. Baca

    652 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 5,625 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a series of investigative reports documenting systemic deficiencies in a jail put the defendant-supervisor on notice of the risk of the harm that befell the plaintiff
  4. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems

    637 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 2,632 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding a complaint failed to satisfy Rule 9(b) where the allegations were lacking in detail
  5. Skidmore v. Swift Co.

    323 U.S. 134 (1944)   Cited 3,823 times   120 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the rulings, interpretations and opinions of the Administrator" of the statute in question, "while not controlling upon the courts by reason of their authority," were nonetheless available for guidance to the extent they had the "power to persuade"
  6. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.

    328 U.S. 680 (1946)   Cited 2,649 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the damage is. . . certain" where employee proved that he performed work that was not paid in accordance with the statutes, and that damages can then be awarded if there is a "basis for a reasonable inference as to the extent of the damages"
  7. Owens v. Local No. 169

    971 F.2d 347 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 508 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding mechanics' on-call time was not compensable
  8. U.S. ex Rel. Costner v. U.S.

    317 F.3d 883 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 266 times
    Finding no intent under the FCA, as matter of law, when a contractor communicates with the government regarding problems and engages in cooperative effort to find a solution
  9. Arriaga v. Fla. Pac. Farms, L.L.C

    305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002)   Cited 200 times
    Holding that FLSA requirements apply to H-2A workers, including the requirement that all wages be provided "free and clear" of improper deductions
  10. Renfro v. City of Emporia

    948 F.2d 1529 (10th Cir. 1991)   Cited 222 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding firefighters' on-call time compensable even though they engaged in some personal pursuits during that time
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 116,150 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  13. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 40,207 times   337 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  14. Section 149:148 - Payment of wages; commissions; exemption by contract; persons deemed employers; provision for cashing check or draft; violation of statute

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149 § 148   Cited 529 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "any employee discharged from [his] employment shall be paid in full on the day of his discharge"
  15. Section 149:148B - Persons performing service not authorized under this chapter deemed employees; exception

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149 § 148B   Cited 179 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Specifying types of services considered to be not those performed by an employee and noting that an employer's failure to make withholdings or payments that would be required for an employee "shall not be considered in making a determination" as to a person's employee status
  16. Section 351 - Property of employee

    Cal. Lab. Code § 351   Cited 108 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Covering gratuities
  17. Section 151:1 - Oppressive and unreasonable wages; validity of contracts

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151 § 1   Cited 32 times

    It is hereby declared to be against public policy for any employer to employ any person in an occupation in this commonwealth at an oppressive and unreasonable wage as defined in section two, and any contract, agreement or understanding for or in relation to such employment shall be null and void. A wage of less than $15.00 per hour, in any occupation, as defined in this chapter, shall conclusively be presumed to be oppressive and unreasonable, wherever the term "minimum wage" is used in this chapter

  18. Section 778.111 - Pieceworker

    29 C.F.R. § 778.111   Cited 56 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing piece-rate pay