53 Cited authorities

New Hampshire v. Maine
532 U.S. 742 (2001) Cited 4,543 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “New Hampshire is equitably barred from asserting—contrary to its position in the 1970's litigation—that the inland Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore”
First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan
514 U.S. 938 (1995) Cited 5,348 times 47 Legal Analyses
Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.
24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000) Cited 1,744 times 45 Legal Analyses
Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable
Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc.
469 F.3d 1257 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 896 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration agreement that was invalid due to unconscionability was not enforceable
Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
328 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 454 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a unilateral modification provision, which provided more notice than required in Ralphs' policy, was substantively unconscionable
Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno
57 Cal.4th 1109 (Cal. 2013) Cited 316 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that the FAA does not permit "additional delay that results from ... an administrative scheme [like the Berman hearing process] to effectuate state policies unrelated to the agreement's enforceability"
Ting v. AT&T
319 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 404 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an enforceable arbitration agreement contained an unconscionable fee-splitting provision
Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
317 F.3d 646 (6th Cir. 2003) Cited 360 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding unenforceable arbitration agreement that limited remedies under Title VII
Intergen N.V. v. Grina
344 F.3d 134 (1st Cir. 2003) Cited 331 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding a party moving to compel arbitration must show that the other party is bound by the arbitration clause at issue
Pokorny v. Quixtar
601 F.3d 987 (9th Cir. 2010) Cited 208 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a unilateral clause shortening the limitations period added to the unconscionability of the contract

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

53 Cited authorities

Holding that under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “New Hampshire is equitably barred from asserting—contrary to its position in the 1970's litigation—that the inland Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore”

Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."

Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable

Holding that an arbitration agreement that was invalid due to unconscionability was not enforceable

Holding that a unilateral modification provision, which provided more notice than required in Ralphs' policy, was substantively unconscionable

Holding that the FAA does not permit "additional delay that results from ... an administrative scheme [like the Berman hearing process] to effectuate state policies unrelated to the agreement's enforceability"

Holding that an enforceable arbitration agreement contained an unconscionable fee-splitting provision

Holding unenforceable arbitration agreement that limited remedies under Title VII

Holding a party moving to compel arbitration must show that the other party is bound by the arbitration clause at issue

Holding that a unilateral clause shortening the limitations period added to the unconscionability of the contract