44 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 264,045 times 281 Legal Analyses
Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 277,266 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 28,940 times 142 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Foman v. Davis
371 U.S. 178 (1962) Cited 29,522 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal
Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA
317 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 4,326 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Rule 9(b) pleading standards apply to California CLRA, FAL, and UCL claims because, though fraud is not an essential element of those statutes, a plaintiff alleges a fraudulent course of conduct as the basis of those claims
Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems
637 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 2,594 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding a complaint failed to satisfy Rule 9(b) where the allegations were lacking in detail
Swartz v. KPMG LLP
476 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 2,935 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”
Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.
567 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 2,337 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that circumstances constituting fraud must be stated with particularity
Parks School of Business, Inc. v. Symington
51 F.3d 1480 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 2,575 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a corporation had standing to sue under § 1981 alleging that defendants discriminated against it because it contracts with racial minorities
Cousins v. Lockyer
568 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 1,406 times
Holding that "state departmental regulations do not establish a federal constitutional violation."
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 358,458 times 954 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 Cited 39,937 times 334 Legal Analyses
Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

44 Cited authorities

Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal

Holding that the Rule 9(b) pleading standards apply to California CLRA, FAL, and UCL claims because, though fraud is not an essential element of those statutes, a plaintiff alleges a fraudulent course of conduct as the basis of those claims

Holding a complaint failed to satisfy Rule 9(b) where the allegations were lacking in detail

Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”

Holding that circumstances constituting fraud must be stated with particularity

Holding that a corporation had standing to sue under § 1981 alleging that defendants discriminated against it because it contracts with racial minorities

Holding that "state departmental regulations do not establish a federal constitutional violation."

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity