33 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 260,142 times 281 Legal Analyses
Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 273,590 times 368 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Moss v. U.S. Secret Service
572 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 8,832 times
Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court's deferral of the summary judgment motion
Swartz v. KPMG LLP
476 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 2,912 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”
Daniels-Hall v. National Educ. Ass'n
629 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2010) Cited 2,147 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding information made publicly available on official government websites appropriate for judicial notice
Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network
18 F.3d 752 (9th Cir. 1994) Cited 1,860 times
Holding that a national organization was not sufficiently connected to a "place" open to the public
Sanders v. Brown
504 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 605 times 1 Legal Analyses
Concluding that in Hoover, the Supreme Court established that "the Midcal test does not apply to sovereign state acts, which are immune from antitrust liability so long as they [are not pre-empted due to their having] authoriz[ed] per se illegal activities"
Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness
496 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2007) Cited 550 times
Explaining that we "are not free to disregard the plain language of a statute and, instead, conjure up legislative purposes and intent out of thin air"
United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman
406 Mass. 811 (Mass. 1990) Cited 271 times
Holding that defendant's motives in benefiting his customers and himself financially did not constitute improper interference
Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
455 Mass. 458 (Mass. 2009) Cited 150 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that intentional misrepresentation plaintiff must establish he “ reasonably relied on the representation as true”
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 354,229 times 943 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 160,289 times 196 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

33 Cited authorities

Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court's deferral of the summary judgment motion

Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”

Holding information made publicly available on official government websites appropriate for judicial notice

Holding that a national organization was not sufficiently connected to a "place" open to the public

Concluding that in Hoover, the Supreme Court established that "the Midcal test does not apply to sovereign state acts, which are immune from antitrust liability so long as they [are not pre-empted due to their having] authoriz[ed] per se illegal activities"

Explaining that we "are not free to disregard the plain language of a statute and, instead, conjure up legislative purposes and intent out of thin air"

Holding that defendant's motives in benefiting his customers and himself financially did not constitute improper interference

Holding that intentional misrepresentation plaintiff must establish he “ reasonably relied on the representation as true”

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."