20 Cited authorities

In re Murchison
349 U.S. 133 (1955) Cited 2,160 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding it was a violation of due process for the same state court judge to act as a "one-man grand jury" in secret hearings, to charge witnesses with perjury and contempt, and to try those witnesses for contempt
Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.
446 U.S. 238 (1980) Cited 576 times
Holding an impartial and disinterested tribunal is required in adjudicative proceedings
Meiri v. Dacon
759 F.2d 989 (2d Cir. 1985) Cited 1,789 times
Holding that medical resident's negative performance evaluations were a valid non-discriminatory reason for termination even where some reviews were positive and reflected good clinical skills and a willingness to learn
Tumey v. Ohio
273 U.S. 510 (1927) Cited 2,166 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Due Process Clause requires recusal when a judge has a "direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest" in a case
Yusuf v. Vassar College
35 F.3d 709 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 682 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff can allege multiple theories for his or her claim, but under any theory "wholly conclusory allegations [will not] suffice for purposes of Rule 12(b)"
Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education
294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 442 times
Holding that students had a property interest in their continued enrollment at a "public institution of higher learning"
Deebs v. Alstom Transp
346 F. App'x 654 (2d Cir. 2009) Cited 92 times
Holding that relying “almost exclusively” on one's “own deposition testimony . . . is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.”
Tedeschi v. Wagner College
49 N.Y.2d 652 (N.Y. 1980) Cited 190 times
Holding that "when a university has adopted a rule or guideline establishing the procedure to be followed in relation to suspension or expulsion that procedure must be substantially observed"
Osteen v. Henley
13 F.3d 221 (7th Cir. 1993) Cited 126 times
Holding that claims for damages against NIU were barred by the Eleventh Amendment because NIU is an Illinois state university
Doe v. University of South
687 F. Supp. 2d 744 (E.D. Tenn. 2009) Cited 76 times
Holding that the plaintiffs had failed to raise a viable promissory estoppel claim where they did not plead "facts to support a finding that the [defendant's] conduct is the equivalent to fraud"

Yu v. Vassar College

20 Cited authorities

Holding it was a violation of due process for the same state court judge to act as a "one-man grand jury" in secret hearings, to charge witnesses with perjury and contempt, and to try those witnesses for contempt

Holding an impartial and disinterested tribunal is required in adjudicative proceedings

Holding that medical resident's negative performance evaluations were a valid non-discriminatory reason for termination even where some reviews were positive and reflected good clinical skills and a willingness to learn

Holding that the Due Process Clause requires recusal when a judge has a "direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest" in a case

Holding that a plaintiff can allege multiple theories for his or her claim, but under any theory "wholly conclusory allegations [will not] suffice for purposes of Rule 12(b)"

Holding that students had a property interest in their continued enrollment at a "public institution of higher learning"

Holding that relying “almost exclusively” on one's “own deposition testimony . . . is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.”

Holding that "when a university has adopted a rule or guideline establishing the procedure to be followed in relation to suspension or expulsion that procedure must be substantially observed"

Holding that claims for damages against NIU were barred by the Eleventh Amendment because NIU is an Illinois state university

Holding that the plaintiffs had failed to raise a viable promissory estoppel claim where they did not plead "facts to support a finding that the [defendant's] conduct is the equivalent to fraud"