§Why CasetextPricing

Yu v. State Street Corp.

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re:

16 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,625 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  2. Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo

    544 U.S. 336 (2005)   Cited 3,550 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the securities statutes have a private of action “not to provide investors with broad insurance against market losses, but to protect them against those economic losses that misrepresentations actually cause”

  3. Lentell v. Merrill Lynch Co., Inc.

    396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 998 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to prove loss causation, a plaintiff must allege "that the misstatement or omission concealed something from the market that, when disclosed, negatively affected the value of the security"

  4. Halperin v. Ebanker Usa.com, Inc.

    295 F.3d 352 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 268 times
    Holding that, under the bespeaks caution doctrine, "[c]ertain alleged misrepresentations in a stock offering are immaterial as a matter of law because it cannot be said that any reasonable investor could consider them important in light of adequate cautionary language set out in the same offering"

  5. Hunt v. Alliance North Amer. Gov. Income Trust

    159 F.3d 723 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 187 times
    Finding it "proper to deny leave to replead where there is no merit in the proposed amendments or amendment would be futile"

  6. In re Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation

    294 F. Supp. 2d 392 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 161 times
    Holding that the lead plaintiff, a stockholder, had standing to assert Section 11 claims on behalf of investors in WorldCom's note offerings where "claims addressed specifically to the [note] offerings rely on the same course of conduct that underlies the claims addressed more generally to WorldCom's securities . . . ."

  7. In re Charles Schwab Corporation Securities Litigation

    257 F.R.D. 534 (N.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 56 times
    Finding that mere participation in a solicitation or sale does not suffice

  8. Panther Partners, Inc. v. Ikanos Communications

    538 F. Supp. 2d 662 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that failure to make a Item 503 disclosure "will generally produce liability under the Securities Act"

  9. In re Van Wagoner Funds, Inc. Securities Litigation

    382 F. Supp. 2d 1173 (N.D. Cal. 2004)   Cited 17 times

    No. C 02-03383 JSW. July 27, 2004 Robert Kennedy O'Reilly, Guri Ademi, Shpetim Ademi, Ademi O'Reilly, LLP, Cudahy, WI, Azra Z. Mehdi, Lerach Coughlin Stoia Robbins LLP, Randi D. Bandman, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach LLP, San Francisco, CA, Michael E. Moskovitz, Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament Rub, Chicago, IL, Lori G. Feldman, Milberg Weiss Bershad Schulman LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs. Peter K. Richardson, Michael Best Friedrich, LLP, Matthew J. Flynn, Cristina D. Hernandez-Malaby,

  10. In re Exabyte Corp. Securities Litigation

    823 F. Supp. 866 (D. Colo. 1993)   Cited 13 times

    Civ. A. No. 92-K-1896. June 8, 1993. James A. Shpall, Wolf Slatkin, Denver, CO, Richard B. Dannenberg, Neil L. Selinger, Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad Selinger, P.C., New York City, and Alan Schulman and Kevin P. Roddy, Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie Lerach, San Diego, CA, for plaintiff/petitioner. Jeffrey B. Rudman, Peter J. MacDonald, Hale Dorr, Boston, MA, and Nancy J. Gegenheimer, Holme Roberts Owen, Denver, CO, for defendant. ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS KANE, Senior District Judge. This is a putative

  11. Section 77k - Civil liabilities on account of false registration statement

    15 U.S.C. § 77k   Cited 2,113 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for a false registration statement "every person who was a director of . . . or partner in the issuer" at time of filing

  12. Section 77l - Civil liabilities arising in connection with prospectuses and communications

    15 U.S.C. § 77l   Cited 824 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing relief if the offering documents contain just one untrue statement of material fact

  13. Section 80a-2 - Definitions; applicability; rulemaking considerations

    15 U.S.C. § 80a-2   Cited 239 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Defining "interested person"

  14. Section 270.22c-1 - Pricing of redeemable securities for distribution, redemption and repurchase

    17 C.F.R. § 270.22c-1   Cited 32 times

    (a) No registered investment company issuing any redeemable security, no person designated in such issuer's prospectus as authorized to consummate transactions in any such security, and no principal underwriter of, or dealer in, any such security shall sell, redeem, or repurchase any such security except at a price based on the current net asset value of such security which is next computed after receipt of a tender of such security for redemption or of an order to purchase or sell such security: