§Why CasetextPricing

Yount v. Jewell et al

MEMORANDUM in Support of 14 MOTION to Intervene as Defendants

21 Cited authorities

  1. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

    542 U.S. 55 (2004)   Cited 1,469 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law

  2. Arizona v. California

    460 U.S. 605 (1983)   Cited 2,212 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that res judicata barred re-opening the quantification of tribes' Winters rights

  3. Trbovich v. Mine Workers

    404 U.S. 528 (1972)   Cited 895 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union member's interest was not adequately represented by the Secretary of Labor because the Secretary had a "duty to serve two distinct interests, which are related, but not identical:" that of the individual union member and that of the general public

  4. Venegas v. Mitchell

    495 U.S. 82 (1990)   Cited 331 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is the party’s right to waive, settle, or negotiate the party’s entitlement to receive attorney’s fees

  5. Southwest Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Berg

    268 F.3d 810 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 416 times
    Holding that the court is to take facts alleged in the pleadings, motion, and supporting declarations as true for purposes of the motion to intervene

  6. U.S. v. Alisal Water Corp.

    370 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 375 times
    Holding that "an economic interest [that is] concrete and related to the underlying subject matter of the action" may permit a "creditor of a defendant to intervene in a lawsuit"

  7. Wilderness Soc. v. U.S. Forest Service

    630 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 284 times
    Holding that injury in an environmental litigation is met "by showing that group members have direct contact with the environmental subject matter threatened by the adverse decision" (quoting Idaho Farm Bureau Fed'n v. Babbitt , 58 F.3d 1392, 1398 (9th Cir. 1995) )

  8. Northwest Forest Resource v. Glickman

    82 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 397 times
    Holding that “the doctrine of last antecedent ... must yield to the most logical meaning of a statute that emerges from its plain language and legislative history”

  9. Idaho Farm Bureau Federation v. Babbitt

    58 F.3d 1392 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 262 times
    Holding that “[o]rdinarily when a regulation is not promulgated in compliance with the APA, the regulation is invalid. However, when equity demands, the regulation can be left in place while the agency follows the necessary procedures.”

  10. California ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S.

    450 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 183 times
    Holding that an applicant "must demonstrate a likelihood that the government will abandon or concede a potentially meritorious" position

  11. Rule 24 - Intervention

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 24   Cited 9,180 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them

  12. Section 1701 - Congressional declaration of policy

    43 U.S.C. § 1701   Cited 546 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs sufficiently pleaded prudential standing as to the FLPMA due only to their "aesthetic and "recreational interest" in land

  13. Section 528 - Development and administration of renewable surface resources for multiple use and sustained yield of products and services; Congressional declaration of policy and purpose

    16 U.S.C. § 528   Cited 236 times
    Requiring administration of National Forest System lands for multiple uses, including recreation