550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 280,791 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Explaining that the failure to present a specific argument below results in waiver, even if the argument "may have been before the district court in more general terms"
Adopting interpretation in which "the new preemption provision preempts all related state-law causes of action against furnishers [of credit information], even willful violations of state common law" (emphasis in original; alteration added; citations omitted)
Holding that a district court adequately stated its intention to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement by "dismissing the suit `without prejudice to reinstatement in the event that . . .'" the terms of the settlement were not honored by the parties