22 Cited authorities

Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
471 U.S. 462 (1985) Cited 17,086 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
Helicopteros Nacionales de Colom. v. Hall
466 U.S. 408 (1984) Cited 9,375 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding that “purchases, even if occurring at regular intervals” were insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
444 U.S. 286 (1980) Cited 10,957 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma
Calder v. Jones
465 U.S. 783 (1984) Cited 4,702 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding a California court had personal jurisdiction over individual defendants when the defendants had not visited the state in connection with an allegedly defamatory article and "[we]re not responsible for the circulation of the article in California"
Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington
326 U.S. 310 (1945) Cited 22,892 times 110 Legal Analyses
Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
United Tech. Corp. v. Mazer
556 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2009) Cited 902 times
Holding that " court without personal jurisdiction is powerless to take further action"
Posner v. Essex Insurance
178 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 1999) Cited 774 times
Holding that the plaintiff “alleged facts, unrebutted by Salem, that established a prima facie case of jurisdiction over Salem”
Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.
902 F.2d 829 (11th Cir. 1990) Cited 792 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that copyright infringement suit against publisher of advocacy campaign newsletter advertising illegal de-scrambling devices does not violate First Amendment
Oldfield v. Pueblo De Bahia Lora, S.A.
558 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2009) Cited 373 times
Holding that a foreign defendant's website advertising its resort was the but-for cause of plaintiff's injury at the resort, but that such an injury was not a foreseeable consequence of that contact
Licciardello v. Lovelady
544 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2008) Cited 363 times
Holding that the plaintiff’s trademark infringement allegations "satisf[ied] the Calder effects test for personal jurisdiction—the commission of an intentional tort, expressly aimed at a specific individual in the forum whose effects were suffered in the forum"
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 160,289 times 196 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
Section 101 - Definitions
17 U.S.C. § 101 Cited 6,452 times 175 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886
Section 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general
17 U.S.C. § 102 Cited 2,281 times 121 Legal Analyses
Granting protection to "literary works"
Section 48.193 - Acts subjecting person to jurisdiction of courts of state
Fla. Stat. § 48.193 Cited 1,639 times 15 Legal Analyses
Referencing Fla. Stat. § 685.102
Rule 1001 - Definitions That Apply to This Article
Fed. R. Evid. 1001 Cited 397 times 3 Legal Analyses
Defining "writing" as "letters, words, numbers, or their equivalent set down in any form"

Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Ziplocal, LP et al

22 Cited authorities

Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

Holding that “purchases, even if occurring at regular intervals” were insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation

Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

Holding a California court had personal jurisdiction over individual defendants when the defendants had not visited the state in connection with an allegedly defamatory article and "[we]re not responsible for the circulation of the article in California"

Holding that " court without personal jurisdiction is powerless to take further action"

Holding that the plaintiff “alleged facts, unrebutted by Salem, that established a prima facie case of jurisdiction over Salem”

Holding that copyright infringement suit against publisher of advocacy campaign newsletter advertising illegal de-scrambling devices does not violate First Amendment

Holding that a foreign defendant's website advertising its resort was the but-for cause of plaintiff's injury at the resort, but that such an injury was not a foreseeable consequence of that contact

Holding that the plaintiff’s trademark infringement allegations "satisf[ied] the Calder effects test for personal jurisdiction—the commission of an intentional tort, expressly aimed at a specific individual in the forum whose effects were suffered in the forum"

Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886

Granting protection to "literary works"

Referencing Fla. Stat. § 685.102

Defining "writing" as "letters, words, numbers, or their equivalent set down in any form"