4 Cited authorities

  1. Bender v. Cnty. of L.A.

    217 Cal.App.4th 968 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 138 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where an arrest is unlawful and excessive force is applied in making the arrest, there has been coercion in violation of the Bane Act
  2. Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises

    4 Cal.App.4th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 29 times

    Docket No. F015043. March 5, 1992. [Opinion certified for partial publication.] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and IV. Appeal from Superior Court of Fresno County, No. 423282-3, James L. Quaschnick, Judge. COUNSEL Thomas Nast for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lawrence A. Haun and Roger A. Brown for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION STONE (W.A.), Acting P.J. In the published portion of this opinion we will conclude

  3. Section 1033.5 - Items allowable as costs

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1033.5   Cited 1,508 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting various types of service as costs
  4. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 278 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best