48 Cited authorities

Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.
555 U.S. 7 (2008) Cited 17,299 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"
District of Columbia et al. v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 (2008) Cited 3,762 times 51 Legal Analyses
Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"
Nken v. Holder
556 U.S. 418 (2009) Cited 3,465 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"
University of Texas v. Camenisch
451 U.S. 390 (1981) Cited 3,162 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
512 U.S. 622 (1994) Cited 1,316 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that rules that distinguish "based only upon the manner in which speakers transmit their messages to viewers, and not upon the messages they carry" are content-neutral
Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo
456 U.S. 305 (1982) Cited 1,797 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that Federal Water Pollution Control Act did not mandate injunctions against its violation
Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (1936) Cited 8,463 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"
Salazar v. Buono
559 U.S. 700 (2010) Cited 226 times 3 Legal Analyses
Reversing Buono v. Kempthorne , 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008), and Buono v. Kempthorne , 502 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2007)
Maryland v. King
567 U.S. 1301 (2012) Cited 204 times
Finding irreparable harm while acknowledging respondent's argument that petitioner's "eight-week delay in applying for a stay undermine[d] its allegation of irreparable harm" was a "sound point[]"
Yakus v. United States
321 U.S. 414 (1944) Cited 1,523 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 did not unconstitutionally delegate the legislative power of Congress
Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 Cited 7,742 times 2 Legal Analyses
Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 62 - Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 Cited 4,207 times 15 Legal Analyses
Granting of stay is discretionary
Section 22-4506 - Issue of a license to carry a pistol
D.C. Code § 22-4506 Cited 10 times
Authorizing issuance of concealed-carry licenses

Wrenn et al v. District of Columbia et al

48 Cited authorities

Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"

Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"

Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."

Holding that rules that distinguish "based only upon the manner in which speakers transmit their messages to viewers, and not upon the messages they carry" are content-neutral

Holding that Federal Water Pollution Control Act did not mandate injunctions against its violation

Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"

Reversing Buono v. Kempthorne , 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008), and Buono v. Kempthorne , 502 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2007)

Finding irreparable harm while acknowledging respondent's argument that petitioner's "eight-week delay in applying for a stay undermine[d] its allegation of irreparable harm" was a "sound point[]"

Holding that Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 did not unconstitutionally delegate the legislative power of Congress

Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Granting of stay is discretionary

Authorizing issuance of concealed-carry licenses