§Why CasetextPricing

Wrenn et al v. District of Columbia et al

Memorandum in opposition to re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction

84 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 17,916 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preliminary injunctions "may only be awarded upon a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief"

  2. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,415 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding no standing existed where alleged injury was "based on hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."

  3. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 4,158 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is "not a new proposition" that a plaintiff had standing to challenge the denial of a gun licensing permit

  4. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 38,991 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

  5. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,709 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Second Amendment applies to the states

  6. Mazurek v. Armstrong

    520 U.S. 968 (1997)   Cited 3,552 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief has a "requirement for substantial proof is much higher" than a defendant's summary judgment motion

  7. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,772 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a facial challenger "must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid"

  8. Payton v. New York

    445 U.S. 573 (1980)   Cited 7,765 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"

  9. Elrod v. Burns

    427 U.S. 347 (1976)   Cited 4,353 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a requirement that public employees join the Democratic Party infringed their freedom of association

  10. Baze v. Rees

    553 U.S. 35 (2008)   Cited 1,066 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Eighth Amendment context that the government's choice of drug can violate the Constitution

  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 23,833 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice

  12. Section 22-4504 - Carrying concealed weapons; possession of weapons during commission of crime of violence; penalty

    D.C. Code § 22-4504   Cited 243 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting carrying weapons in D.C. without a license

  13. Section 1-206.02 - Limitations on the Council

    D.C. Code § 1-206.02   Cited 43 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the Council from "[e]nact[ing] any act, or enact[ing] any act to amend or repeal any Act of Congress, which concerns the functions or property of the United States. . . ."

  14. Section 7-2509.11 - Rules

    D.C. Code § 7-2509.11   Cited 6 times

    The Chief of the MPD, pursuant to subchapter I of Chapter 5 of Title 2 [§ 2-501 et seq.], shall issue rules to implement the provisions of D.C. Law 20-279, including rules: (1) To establish criteria for determining when an applicant has, pursuant to section 6 of the Pistols and Other Dangerous Weapons Act [§ 22-4506 ]: (A) Demonstrated a good reason to fear injury to his or her person, which shall at a minimum require a showing of a special need for self-protection distinguishable from the general