§Why CasetextPricing

Wrenn et al v. District of Columbia et al

Memorandum in opposition to re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction

84 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 17,299 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,232 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the absence of some independent existing or impending harm, plaintiffs "cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves"

  3. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 38,569 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

  4. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 3,762 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"

  5. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,467 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

  6. Mazurek v. Armstrong

    520 U.S. 968 (1997)   Cited 3,452 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief has a "requirement for substantial proof is much higher" than a defendant's summary judgment motion

  7. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,564 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"

  8. Payton v. New York

    445 U.S. 573 (1980)   Cited 7,691 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"

  9. Elrod v. Burns

    427 U.S. 347 (1976)   Cited 4,280 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that local government could not constitutionally base public employment opportunities on political affiliation or nonaffiliation

  10. Baze v. Rees

    553 U.S. 35 (2008)   Cited 1,049 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Eighth Amendment context that the government's choice of drug can violate the Constitution

  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 23,033 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice

  12. Section 22-4504 - Carrying concealed weapons; possession of weapons during commission of crime of violence; penalty

    D.C. Code § 22-4504   Cited 241 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting carrying weapons in D.C. without a license

  13. Section 1-206.02 - Limitations on the Council

    D.C. Code § 1-206.02   Cited 43 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the Council from "[e]nact[ing] any act, or enact[ing] any act to amend or repeal any Act of Congress, which concerns the functions or property of the United States. . . ."

  14. Section 7-2509.11 - Rules

    D.C. Code § 7-2509.11   Cited 6 times

    The Chief of the MPD, pursuant to subchapter I of Chapter 5 of Title 2 [§ 2-501 et seq.], shall issue rules to implement the provisions of D.C. Law 20-279, including rules: (1) To establish criteria for determining when an applicant has, pursuant to section 6 of the Pistols and Other Dangerous Weapons Act [§ 22-4506 ]: (A) Demonstrated a good reason to fear injury to his or her person, which shall at a minimum require a showing of a special need for self-protection distinguishable from the general