§Why CasetextPricing

Wormley v. United States of America et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Summary Judgment, 21 MOTION to Dismiss

19 Cited authorities

  1. Clark v. District of Columbia

    708 A.2d 632 (D.C. 1997)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "expert testimony was required" in a case involving the operation of a juvenile detention center, where juvenile in custody committed suicide

  2. Pannu v. Jacobson

    909 A.2d 178 (D.C. 2006)   Cited 18 times
    Stating that the standard of care for common carriers and doctors is the course of action that a reasonably prudent actor within the same field would have taken

  3. Jones v. National R.R

    942 A.2d 1103 (D.C. 2008)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that Amtrak's "unpublished, internal procedures cannot embody the standard of care under a negligence per se theory," but instead, "may be admissible as bearing on the standard of care"

  4. Watson v. District of Columbia

    Civil Action No. 02-980 (GK) (D.D.C. Jul. 18, 2005)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 02-980 (GK). July 18, 2005 ORDER Plaintiff Merle Watson brings this action alleging violations of his Fourth, Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various common law violations. Defendants are the District of Columbia (the "District"); Odie Washington, then-Director of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections ("Corrections"); Harold Jones, Legal Instruments Examiner at the District of Columbia Central Detention Facility; Elwood York, Records Office

  5. Leroy Adventures v. Cafritz Harbour Group

    640 A.2d 193 (D.C. 1994)   Cited 5 times
    Finding HVAC system was not a fixture because the tenant did not intend to permanently annex the system to the real property

  6. District of Columbia v. Frick

    291 A.2d 83 (D.C. 1972)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 6008, 6009. Argued April 10, 1972. Decided May 26, 1972. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Paul McArdle, J. David P. Sutton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellant. Harold A. Sakayan, Rockville, Md., with whom Vernon Haas, Oxon Hill, Md., was on the brief, for appellee Frick. Austin F. Canfield, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellee Greyhound Lines, Inc. Richard W. Galiher

  7. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,861 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  8. Section 1997e - Suits by prisoners

    42 U.S.C. § 1997e   Cited 54,056 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prisoners must exhaust "available" administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court

  9. Section 3563 - Conditions of probation

    18 U.S.C. § 3563   Cited 14,010 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Permitting court to require a defendant to submit to "psychological treatment . . . as specified by the court"

  10. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,201 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  11. Section 3624 - Release of a prisoner

    18 U.S.C. § 3624   Cited 5,959 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting to the Bureau of Prisons the authority to order home confinement

  12. Section 552a - Records maintained on individuals

    5 U.S.C. § 552a   Cited 4,454 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities

  13. Section 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

    18 U.S.C. § 242   Cited 3,870 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section," the defendant "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both"

  14. Section 402 - Old-age and survivors insurance benefit payments

    42 U.S.C. § 402   Cited 2,662 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Referring to the "legitimate ... child" of an individual

  15. Section 4042 - Duties of Bureau of Prisons

    18 U.S.C. § 4042   Cited 1,040 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining the Bureau's duty to protect inmates

  16. Section 3651 to 3656 - Repealed

    18 U.S.C. § 3651 - 18 U.S.C. § 3656   Cited 842 times
    Granting the sentencing court the power to " suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the defendant on probation"

  17. Section 404.468 - Nonpayment of benefits to prisoners

    20 C.F.R. § 404.468   Cited 70 times
    Stating that "[n]o monthly benefits will be paid to any individual for any month any part of which the individual is confined in a jail, prison, or other penal institution or correctional facility for conviction of a felony"