§Why CasetextPricing

Wilson v. The United States of America et al

MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer re Third Party Complaint with supporting memo

4 Cited authorities

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership

    507 U.S. 380 (1993)   Cited 7,860 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that clients must be held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys

  2. Bennett v. City of Holyoke

    362 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2004)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that raising affirmative defense "for the first time in a post-trial motion for relief from judgment" was too late to preserve the issue for appeal

  3. Dimmitt v. Ockenfels

    407 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 49 times
    Upholding a denial of an extension when counsel's reason for delay was, among other things, "inexperience with the requirements of the District Court," "unfamiliarity with the local rules," and "extreme difficulties with . . . perfecting his ECF participation"

  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."