Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete

Irwin v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

Holding that a statutory time limit with the same characteristics is subject to equitable tolling

Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc.

Holding that summary judgment was appropriate even where the decision-maker's reason is "foolish or trivial or even baseless"

Kennedy v. Applause, Inc.

Holding that Rule 4 did not apply because the amount of fees and costs had yet to be determined and the district court had requested briefing on the matter

Payan v. Aramark

Holding that the filing deadlines established by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) function as a statute of limitations, and "because the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, the defendant bears the burden of proving that the plaintiff filed beyond the limitations period"

Nelmida v. Shelly Eurocars, Inc.

Holding that the ninety-day period within which to file suit began running when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") attempted delivery of the right-to-sue notice at the address of record

City of Vernon v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

Affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment based on the "serious flaws in the only damage study could be proffered to the jury" which placed the plaintiff "in the position of having no proper proof of damages at all"

Noonan v. Seattle City Light

Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities

Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"

Section 2000e-1 - Exemption

Exempting religious employers from Title VII's prohibition against religious discrimination in hiring

Section 1614.407 - Civil action: Title VII, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Rehabilitation Act, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

Authorizing civil actions if no final action is taken within 180 days after a complaint is filed

Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”