§Why CasetextPricing

Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

REPLY BRIEF re Response in Opposition, 52 Motion for Summary Judgment

10 Cited authorities

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.

    456 U.S. 461 (1982)   Cited 2,471 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "full and fair opportunity to litigate" is satisfied by minimum procedural requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment

  2. Marrese v. American Academy of Ortho. Surgeons

    470 U.S. 373 (1985)   Cited 2,007 times
    Holding that the full faith and credit statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1738, "directs a federal court to refer to the preclusion law of the State in which judgment was rendered"

  3. Brown v. Tucci

    960 F. Supp. 2d 544 (W.D. Pa. 2013)   Cited 40 times
    In Brown, 254 F.3d at 668, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that ADA claims were precluded because interpretation of the CBA seniority provisions could conclusively dispose of the claim.

  4. Spyridakis v. the Riesling Group, Inc.

    398 F. App'x 793 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 26 times
    Affirming the district court's conclusion that findings of the UCBR can have preclusive effect under Rue

  5. Sheets v. Unemploy. Comp. Bd. of Review

    708 A.2d 884 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1998)   Cited 42 times
    Holding a claimant's threat that he “may ... shoot” a co-worker violated the rule

  6. Mathis v. Christian Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.

    91 F. Supp. 3d 651 (E.D. Pa. 2015)   Cited 12 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Plaintiff is not barred from litigating his claims because Section 829 prohibits findings of fact and conclusions of law from unemployment compensation proceedings from being conclusive or binding in subsequent actions

  7. Helfrich v. Lehigh Valley Hospital

    No. 03-cv-05793 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 21, 2005)   Cited 15 times
    Providing detailed discussion of issue

  8. Nelson v. Allan's Waste Water Serv., Inc.

    2:11-cv-1334 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2014)   Cited 5 times

    2:11-cv-1334 01-10-2014 DEANNA NELSON, Plaintiff, v. ALLAN'S WASTE WATER SERVICE, INC., JEFF HILLBERRY, ROBERT ALLAN SHIPMAN & CAROLYN STEVENSON SHIPMAN, Defendants. Terrence F. McVerry MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT Pending before the Court are DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE # 1 (ECF No. 74), DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE # 2 (ECF No. 75), and DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE # 3 (ECF No. 76) filed by Allan's Waste Water Service, Inc. ("AWWS") and Robert Allan Shipman and Carolyn Stevenson Shipman

  9. Thomas v. Parkway W. Career & Tech. Ctr.

    12cv1867 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2013)   Cited 1 times

    12cv1867 03-22-2013 THOMAS R. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PARKWAY WEST CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER, JACK HIGHFIELD in his individual and official capacity, Defendants. Arthur J. Schwab ELECTRONICALLY FILED Memorandum Opinion on Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 11) I. Introduction This is an employment discrimination action. Plaintiff, who is a member of the United States Naval Reserves (hereinafter "the Reserves"), alleges that he was prematurely terminated and discriminated against in his employment as a

  10. Section 1738 - State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings; full faith and credit

    28 U.S.C. § 1738   Cited 7,523 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Referring to "[t]he Acts of the legislature" in the full faith and credit context