31 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 267,100 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 280,127 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Brooks v. Ross

    578 F.3d 574 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 3,352 times
    Holding that a claim is plausible if the facts alleged raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will yield evidence supporting the allegations
  4. Tal v. Hogan

    453 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,441 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "because the extensiveness of the threat is a question of fact" the court would "assume for the purposes of this opinion that the predicate acts alleged ... establish a pattern of racketeering activity"
  5. GFF Corp. v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.

    130 F.3d 1381 (10th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,596 times
    Holding failure to address district court's alternative ground for granting summary judgment compelled affirmance
  6. Koch v. Koch Indus., Inc.

    203 F.3d 1202 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 775 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs "waive[d] their bias argument on appeal because they failed to timely move for disqualification"
  7. St. Louis Baptist Temple v. F. D. I. C

    605 F.2d 1169 (10th Cir. 1979)   Cited 1,242 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and outside of the federal judicial system
  8. Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

    707 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 357 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant violates the TCPA by calling a plaintiff's cellphone using an autodialing system without the plaintiff's consent
  9. U.S. ex Rel. v. Regence Bluecross

    472 F.3d 702 (10th Cir. 2006)   Cited 422 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that liability under a causation theory “requir[es] more than mere passive acquiescence”
  10. Greenberg v. Wolfberg

    1994 OK 147 (Okla. 1995)   Cited 82 times
    Holding in a malicious prosecution case where the prior suit was a civil suit that "[d]ismissal without prejudice is not a termination favorable to the malicious-prosecution plaintiff."
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,853 times   961 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 337,251 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  13. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,069 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  14. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 40,154 times   335 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  15. Section 227 - Restrictions on use of telephone equipment

    47 U.S.C. § 227   Cited 5,814 times   744 Legal Analyses
    Granting exclusive jurisdiction to federal courts over actions brought by state attorney generals
  16. Section 1033 - Proceedings by petition, when - Summons

    Okla. Stat. tit. 12 § 1033   Cited 14 times

    If more than thirty (30) days after a judgment, decree, or appealable order has been filed, proceedings to vacate or modify the judgment, decree, or appealable order, on the grounds mentioned in paragraphs 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Section 1031 of this title, shall be by petition, verified by affidavit, setting forth the judgment, decree, or appealable order, the grounds to vacate or modify it, and the defense to the action, if the party applying was defendant. On this petition, a summons shall issue