118 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 263,477 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,716 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Scheuer v. Rhodes

    416 U.S. 232 (1974)   Cited 22,583 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that executive branch officers had qualified immunity
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

    444 U.S. 286 (1980)   Cited 11,008 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma
  5. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 23,009 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
  6. Wyatt v. Terhune

    315 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 4,362 times
    Holding that defendants have the burden of proving the absence of exhaustion
  7. Merck Co. v. Reynolds

    559 U.S. 633 (2010)   Cited 682 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because no event preceding the critical date constituted "discovery" of facts necessary to bring the complaint, the plaintiffs' suit was timely
  8. Manzarek v. Marine

    519 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 2,907 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in evaluating a complaint on a motion to dismiss, the court “accept factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
  9. Lampf v. Gilbertson

    501 U.S. 350 (1991)   Cited 1,117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding comparable bar not subject to equitable tolling
  10. American Pipe Construction Co. v. Utah

    414 U.S. 538 (1974)   Cited 2,155 times   163 Legal Analyses
    Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"
  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 93,795 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  12. Section 2305.09 - Four years - certain torts

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.09   Cited 968 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Relating to the recovery of personal property
  13. Section 2305.19 - Saving in case of reversal

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.19   Cited 844 times
    Saving statute triggered when "the plaintiff fails otherwise than upon the merits"
  14. Section 2307.382 - Personal jurisdiction

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.382   Cited 600 times
    Enumerating bases for specific jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, e.g., transacting any business in the state or causing tortious injury in the state
  15. Section 202 - Cause of action accruing without the state

    N.Y. CPLR 202   Cited 594 times
    Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does
  16. Section 1707.43 - Remedies of purchaser in unlawful sale

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1707.43   Cited 159 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that every "participant" in the sale of unregistered securities is jointly and severally liable to the defrauded purchaser
  17. Section 2923.34 - Civil proceeding seeking relief from any person whose conduct constitutes corrupt activity

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.34   Cited 123 times
    Authorizing civil claim for relief against any person who violates or conspires to violate section 2923.32
  18. Section 1707.41 - Civil liability of seller for fraud

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1707.41   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Relying on written circular, prospectus, or advertisement and sustaining damages due to false material statement therein or omission of material facts
  19. Section 1707.40 - Civil liabilities

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1707.40   Cited 10 times

    Except as provided in section 1707.261 of the Revised Code, sections 1707.01 to 1707.50 of the Revised Code create no new civil liabilities, and do not limit or restrict common law liabilities for deception or fraud other than as specified in sections 1707.042, 1707.043, 1707.41, 1707.42, and 1707.43 of the Revised Code, and there is no civil liability for noncompliance with orders, requirements, rules, or regulations made by the division of securities under sections 1707.19, 1707.20, 1707.201, and