17 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 237,946 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 113,875 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 26,573 times 230 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Adickes v. Kress Co.
398 U.S. 144 (1970) Cited 25,163 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983
Calderone v. United States
799 F.2d 254 (6th Cir. 1986) Cited 1,530 times
Holding that where a summary judgment movant has the burden of proof, his showing must be sufficient for the court to hold that no reasonable trier of fact could find other than for the moving party
County of Tuolumne v. Sonora Community Hosp
236 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 651 times
Holding that the Cartwright Act was "modeled after the Sherman Act" and so the analysis "mirrors the analysis under federal law"
Giles v. General Motors Accep
494 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 415 times
Holding that the economic loss doctrine "does not bar recovery in tort where the defendant had a duty imposed by law rather than by contract and where the defendant's intentional breach of that duty caused purely monetary harm to the plaintiff"
Admiralty Fund v. Hugh Johnson Co.
677 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 819 times
Holding that time limitation in section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 did not allow for equitable tolling
Idema v. Dreamworks, Inc.
162 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (C.D. Cal. 2001) Cited 359 times
Holding that the plaintiff's claim for negligent interference with prospective economic advantage did "not protect any right `qualitatively different' from those rights protected by copyright"
British Airways Bd. v. Boeing Co.
585 F.2d 946 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 661 times
Holding that a plaintiff must point to specific evidence creating a triable issue of material fact
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 331,402 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,480 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

West v. Recontrust Company et al

17 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983

Holding that where a summary judgment movant has the burden of proof, his showing must be sufficient for the court to hold that no reasonable trier of fact could find other than for the moving party

Holding that the Cartwright Act was "modeled after the Sherman Act" and so the analysis "mirrors the analysis under federal law"

Holding that the economic loss doctrine "does not bar recovery in tort where the defendant had a duty imposed by law rather than by contract and where the defendant's intentional breach of that duty caused purely monetary harm to the plaintiff"

Holding that time limitation in section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 did not allow for equitable tolling

Holding that the plaintiff's claim for negligent interference with prospective economic advantage did "not protect any right `qualitatively different' from those rights protected by copyright"

Holding that a plaintiff must point to specific evidence creating a triable issue of material fact

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system