§Why CasetextPricing

Veterans for Common Sense et al v. Peake et al

Reply Memorandum re MOTION for Protective Order to Stay Discovery from the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

2 Cited authorities

  1. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litig.

    231 F.R.D. 331 (N.D. Ill. 2005)   Cited 119 times
    Finding untimely motion to compel can only succeed by showing actual and substantial prejudice.

  2. In re U.S.

    463 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2006)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that jurisdiction was satisfied because the statute invoked was money-mandating, even though it was “clear from the face of complaint that [the plaintiff did] not come within the reach of [the statute]”