§Why CasetextPricing

Veterans for Common Sense et al v. Peake et al

Memorandum in Opposition re Motion to Strike Declarations Submitted on Reply

3 Cited authorities

  1. Londrigan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    670 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e)'s “requirement of personal knowledge by the affiant is unequivocal, and cannot be circumvented. An affidavit based merely on information and belief is unacceptable”

  2. McColm v. San Francisco Housing Authority

    No. C 02-5810 PJH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2006)   Cited 1 times

    No. C 02-5810 PJH. December 11, 2006 ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER PROHIBITING PLAINTIFF FROM ENGAGING IN VERBALLY ABUSIVE CONDUCT AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNTER MOTION PHYLLIS HAMILTON, District Judge On December 6, 2006, a hearing was held on defendant A-1 Security's motion to prohibit pro per plaintiff Patricia McColm ("McColm") from engaging in verbally abusive conduct and for monetary sanctions. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Guy Stilson ("Stilson"), from

  3. Ramo v. Department of the Navy

    487 F. Supp. 127 (N.D. Cal. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    Denying a plaintiff's FOIA request for identifying information about FBI agents on the grounds that government agencies have a substantial interest in protecting the identities of their agents