§Why CasetextPricing

Varlesi v. Wayne State University et al

MEMORANDUM Regarding Judicial Notice of Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

6 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. ex Rel. Dingle v. Bioport Corp.

    270 F. Supp. 2d 968 (W.D. Mich. 2003)   Cited 178 times
    Finding that federal courts may take judicial notice of “public records and government documents available from reliable sources on the Internet”

  2. Polley v. Allen

    132 S.W.3d 223 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 66 times
    Discussing doctrine of judicial notice

  3. Knoch v. Astrue

    Case No. 6:07-cv-1645-Orl-DAB (M.D. Fla. Mar. 13, 2009)

    Case No. 6:07-cv-1645-Orl-DAB. March 13, 2009 ORDER DAVID BAKER, Magistrate Judge This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: PLAINTIFF'S [UNCONTESTED] PETITION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (Doc. No. 26) FILED: March 11, 2009 THEREON ORDERED GRANTED. _____________________________________________________________ it is that the motion is Plaintiff's Motion for an award of fees follows the issuance of an Order and Judgment reversing the decision of

  4. In re Davis

    03-16085 B, AP 03-1294 B (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 17, 2006)

    03-16085 B, AP 03-1294 B. January 17, 2006 Spoto, Slater Sirwakta, Kevin J. Sirwatka, Esq., of counsel Jamestown, New York, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Damon Morey LLP, Stephen M. O'Neill, Esq., of counsel, Buffalo, New York, Attorneys for Defendant. DECISION ORDER CARL BUCKI, Bankruptcy Judge Contending that repayment of her student loan would impose an undue hardship, the debtor commenced the present adversary proceeding for a declaration that that loan is dischargeable. The central issue of this

  5. Giles Industries, Inc. v. United States

    650 F.2d 274 (Fed. Cir. 1981)

    No. 287-75. May 20, 1981. Charles F. Wood, Louisville, Ky., attorney of record, for plaintiff. Marc Levey, Washington, D.C., with whom was Acting Asst. Atty. Gen. John F. Murray, Washington, D.C., for defendant; Theodore D. Peyser and Donald H. Olson, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before FRIEDMAN, Chief Judge, and KUNZIG and BENNETT, Judges. OPINION PER CURIAM: This case comes before the court on plaintiff's motion, filed March 25, 1981, moving that judgment be entered on the recommended decision

  6. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 28,534 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."