24 Cited authorities

  1. Board of Regents v. Roth

    408 U.S. 564 (1972)   Cited 14,689 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."
  2. Lee v. City of L.A.

    250 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 10,604 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss "by relying on extrinsic evidence and by taking judicial notice of disputed matters of fact to support its ruling"
  3. Castro v. Cnty. of L.A.

    833 F.3d 1060 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 2,440 times
    Holding that the Fourteenth Amendment's "objective standard" set forth in Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 135 S. Ct. 2466, applies to a pretrial detainee's failure-to-protect claim
  4. Galen v. Los Angeles

    477 F.3d 652 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,290 times
    Holding that a one million dollar bond set for a charge of domestic battery was not excessive due to the safety concern for the victim
  5. Doe v. Unocal Corp.

    248 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 934 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)
  6. Portman v. County of Santa Clara

    995 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 784 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public defender did not have a property right in his job where city and state law provided that the public defender serves at the will of the Board of Supervisors
  7. S.E.C. v. Ross

    504 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 459 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that relief defendants who were employed as sales agents for a company that violated securities laws had "presumptive title" to the commissions they "received compensation in return for services rendered"
  8. Federation of Afr. Amer. Contrs. v. Oakland

    96 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 579 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1981 provides a cause of action against a state actor
  9. Hydrick v. Hunter

    669 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 315 times
    Holding defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiffs' claims for money damages but allowing plaintiffs to proceed on remand with claims for declaratory and injunctive relief
  10. Benny v. Pipes

    799 F.2d 489 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 502 times
    Holding that defendants had not appeared despite filing three motions for an extension of time to answer the complaint
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,675 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 69,253 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  13. Section 1981 - Equal rights under the law

    42 U.S.C. § 1981   Cited 37,932 times   237 Legal Analyses
    Granting equal rights to "make and enforce contracts" without regard to race
  14. Section 2000e-2 - Unlawful employment practices

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2   Cited 28,319 times   171 Legal Analyses
    Adopting case law prior to June 4, 1989, “with respect to the concept of ‘alternative employment practice’ ”
  15. Section 12-821 - General limitation; public employee

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-821   Cited 288 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Imposing oneyear statute of limitations on claims against a public entity or employees
  16. Section 41-1481 - Filing charges; investigation; findings; conciliation; compliance proceedings; appeals; attorney fees; violation; classification

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1481   Cited 26 times
    Stating that a charge must be filed within one hundred and eighty days from the date of the alleged discriminator act
  17. Rule 4.1 - Service of Process Within Arizona

    Ariz. R. Civ. P. 4.1   Cited 194 times

    (a)Territorial Limits of Effective Service. All process-including a summons-may be served anywhere within Arizona. (b)Serving a Summons and Complaint or Other Pleading. The summons and the pleading being served must be served together within the time allowed under Rule 4(i). The serving party must furnish the necessary copies to the person who makes service. Service is complete when made. (c)Waiving Service. (1)Requesting a Waiver. An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service